Tax Credit and Retirement Saving Response | Online Assignment Help

Brett Comer(Oct 23, 2018 9:35 AM)- Read by: 5

 Reply

Sue is working at a sports bar waiting on tables while attending college.  She is currently enrolled as a sophomore in the school of business at State University majoring in human resource management.  What are the possible tax credits or deductions that she can take for her tuition, books, supplies, transportation to classes and fees associated with her education? 

This is an excellent question because there are several different tax benefits available to Sue.  As we learned a few weeks ago there are several for AGI deductions available for people like Sue that are interested in higher learning.  These deductions work to lower Sue’s taxable income dollar for dollar whereas any education credit she is eligible for lowers her overall tax dollar for dollar.

According to Spilker et al. (2015) Sue is eligible to deduct up to $4,000 in tuition and fees from her college education if she earns $65,000 AGI or less.  Since she is a part time bartender I assume she is likely eligible for this deduction.  Of note, this deduction is only for tuition and fees and does not include any tax benefits for the funds she spends on books, supplies, transportation, or room and board.  Sue could apply for a student loan that would help her pay for costs as transportation or room and board and the interest on that loan would also qualify as a for AGI deduction if she earns $65,000 or less (Spilker et al., 2015).   The educational loan interest deduction is really the only way to get any tax benefit that is associated with transportation or room and board.

In my opinion Sue should take advantage of the American Opportunity Credit (AOC) which is a tax credit that can only be used during the individual’s first four years of post-secondary education (Spilker et al., 2015).  This tax credit is more advantageous than the deductions mentioned above because it decreases her overall tax dollar for dollar and is even refundable up to 40% of the value of the credit (Spilker et al., 2015).  The credit is limited to tuition, fees, and course materials and pays 100% for the first $2,000 of eligible expenses and then 25% for the next $2,000 of eligible expenses (Spilker et al, 2015).  If she earns $80,000 or less in AGI she is eligible to claim this tax credit (Spilker et al, 2015).  Unfortunately, the credit cannot be combined with the deductions mentioned above (Spilker et al., 2015).

Sue also needs your advice about finding a retirement plan or saving plan to start putting some money away for retirement.  What advice do you have for her?

There are several different avenues Sue could take concerning beginning to save for retirement.  Since she is a part time bartender I assume she is not eligible for an employer sponsored retirement plan and will likely have to do something on her own to start saving.  I am a big fan of the Roth Individual Retirement Account (IRA) since it allows both the principal and earnings to grow tax free (Kofsky, 2016).  Any type of deferred tax retirement plan is less advantageous for Sue since she is currently in low earning years and will not receive much tax benefit from lowering her taxable income.  I think the benefit of the Roth IRA is best summed up by saying you are “paying a little tax now in return for a larger tax-free account in the future” (Kofsky, 2016, p. 163).  Sue can set up a Roth IRA online using any of the big retirement brokerages such as Schwab, Vanguard, or another.  Once she establishes her account she can seek out advice from them on what investment vehicles she should invest her IRA in based on the risk she is interested in taking on.

References

Kofsky, A. M. B. (2016). Rehabilitating frankenstein’s monster: Repairing the public policy of

the roth IRA. Albany Law Review, 80(1), 161.

Spilker, B.C., Ayers, B.C., Outslay, E, Weaver, C. D., Barrick, J. A., Robinson, J. R., &   Worsham,

R. (2015). Taxation of individuals and business  entities. New York, NY:  McGraw Hill                    Education.

William Whitley(Oct 24, 2018 10:26 AM)– Read by: 3

Mark as Read  Reply

Brett,

You made a good point with “In my opinion Sue should take advantage of the American Opportunity Credit (AOC) which is a tax credit that can only be used during the individual’s first four years of post-secondary education (Spilker et al., 2015).  This tax credit is more advantageous than the deductions mentioned above because it decreases her overall tax dollar for dollar and is even refundable up to 40% of the value of the credit (Spilker et al., 2015).  The credit is limited to tuition, fees, and course materials and pays 100% for the first $2,000 of eligible expenses and then 25% for the next $2,000 of eligible expenses (Spilker et al, 2015).  If she earns $80,000 or less in AGI she is eligible to claim this tax credit (Spilker et al, 2015).  Unfortunately, the credit cannot be combined with the deductions mentioned above (Spilker et al., 2015). “.

Tax credits always seem like a better deal than a deduction on Schedule A.

Brett Comer(Oct 24, 2018 10:38 AM)– Read by: 2

Mark as Read  Reply

Dr. Whitley,

I totally agree, whenever I see that I am eligible for a tax credit I get a smile.  I was excited to see that the new tax law allows for a child tax credit of $2,000 per child.  I have three children so that put a smile on my face!

Brett

Diego Rugel(Oct 23, 2018 10:57 PM)– Read by: 4

Mark as Read  Reply

As we may by now, Tax credits reduce a taxpayer’s tax liability dollar for dollar. There are three categories of tax credits and they are: nonrefundable personal, refundable personal, or business credits depending on the nature of the credit.

In this week’s forum scenario, we are told that Sue works at a sports bar waiting while she is also a sophomore in College. Congress provides the American opportunity credit (AOC) also known as the Hope scholarly credit and the lifetime learning credit promoting taxpayers and their dependents to seek a higher level of education. The American Opportunity is available for students in their first four years of college education. In order for Sue to get this education credit she must be at least a half-time student. For 2014, the amount of education credit is 100 percent of the first $2,000 of eligible expenses paid by the taxpayer plus 25 percent of the next $2,000 of eligible expenses. That being said, the maximum AOC for eligible expenses in 2014 credit per taxpayer is $2,500. Expenses covered by the AOC includes tuition, fees and course materials.

As Sue continues to progress in her education, congress provides the lifetime learning credit which, applies to the cost of tuition and fees during a taxpayer’s graduate level education. Students are not limited to claim expenses incurred in the first four years, they may claim up to 20% of eligible expenses up to an annual maximum of $10,000 of eligible expenses (Spilker, 2015).

Now regarding to the idea of to what retirement plan or saving plan should she begin to contribute really depend on the employer and what type of retirement saving plans are being provided. Sue has a lot of choices to choose from, let’s just say that her employer at the sports bar doesn’t provide a retirement she can obtain her own retirement security through individually manager retirement plans also known as IRAs. In most respects the characteristics of the traditional 401(k) plan are similar to those of the traditional IRA.  Traditional IRAs contributions are for AGI deductions. In this case, assuming that Sue is a young student we can assume that she is under 50 years old her deduction will be limited to $5,000 (Spilker, 2015).

Reference

Spilker, B. (2015). Taxation of Individuals and Business Entities Edition 6thMcGraw-Hill.  

William Whitley(Oct 24, 2018 10:30 AM)– Read by: 3

Mark as Read  Reply

Good point about credits Diego.  I would much rather have a tax credit than an itemized deduction.   I think itemized deductions may be on their way out anyway.  See below:

SALT and the reason behind it!

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act has been touted as the largest tax cut in modern history.  Yet there has been a lot of talk about how some of the changes included in this legislation will result in some taxpayers losing deductions that they have counted on for years.   Let’s take a step back and think about how we got where we are.   To start with Code Section 61 of the Internal Revenue Code states that everything item of income is taxable unless there is specific code section that says an item can be excluded from taxation.

Over the years, Congress has excluded some items from being taxable (life insurance proceeds received, for example).    To make sure taxpayers report the items that are taxable, reporting rules have been enacted to provide IRS advance notice that someone has received taxable income.  These rules address requirements to provide 1099 forms, W-2 forms and other documents in electronic format for taxable items such as gambling winnings, discharge of debts, interest income, dividend income, payments to independent contractors and many other sources of income.   The effect of these reporting rules allows the IRS to preload in their computer system just about every item of income someone receives before that person files the tax return.

The new tax bill addresses what someone might claim on Schedule A for itemized deductions.  Keep in mind that these deductions are personal expenses allowed as a deduction by Congress and that means that they can be disallowed.  But, it isn’t easy to pass legislation to make the deductions completely disappear because the political fall-out might very well cost a Congressmember a chance at being re-elected.

So, the hidden agenda that the new media failed to address it this.   The changes in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that affect itemized deductions were put in place to allow electronic auditing of a lot more tax returns by reducing the number of people who can find enough itemized deductions to file Schedule A.    The tax legislation increased the standard deduction to $12,000 for single, $24,000 for married filing jointly and $18,000 for those that can file as head of household.  This change alone will keep a lot of people from finding enough itemized deductions to file the “long form”.

Then, in addition to increasing the hurdle rate that must be met to file Schedule the tax act includes some changes that reduce or eliminate some of the itemized deductions that were allowed in 2017.

The deduction for state and local taxes (SALT) is limited to $10,000.  This was a hotly debated item in Congress because state taxes in several states can add up to a lot more than $10,000.  Taxpayers in those states can very well end up paying more in Federal taxes in 2018.  Also, foreign real estate taxes are no longer deductible as part of the SALT deduction.

The deduction for home mortgage interest has been limited to interest paid on indebtedness of $750,000 ($375,000 for married filing separately) and home equity interest is no longer deductible.  From an audit standpoint, continuing to allow a deduction for mortgage interest is not a problem because mortgage companies must provide the interest information to the IRS in electronic format, so it can be added to that big computer system they have.

In addition to the changes previously mentioned, moving expenses are no longer deductible.   Miscellaneous work-related expenses are no longer deductible.  Tax preparation expenses are no longer deductible.   Casualty losses are no longer deductible unless the losses were the result of a federally declared disaster.

So, even though the tax brackets are lower for 2018, some taxpayers will pay more because, apparently, one of the goals was to reduce the number of people filing Schedule to allow more tax returns to be electronically audited which should reduce the cost to administer the tax system.

Reference: https://www.thebalance.com/new-tax-bill-itemized-deductions-4160594

Brett Comer(Oct 24, 2018 10:36 AM)– Read by: 3

Mark as Read  Reply

Diego,

I thought your point about using a traditional IRA was an important one because as you said it is a for AGI deduction which allows someone to lower their AGI and hence their tax.  The flip side to using a traditional IRA is that both the contribution and earnings are still taxed, they are just deferred and taxed at a later time.  Upon withdrawal the earnings and contribution are taxed as regular income.  This means we get into a debate of whether it is better to defer income via a traditional IRA to lower your AGI now at the expense of potentially having a higher AGI later.  Many people go with this strategy because they argue that you are likely earning more money now then you will be earning when you retire.  This means that you are essentially in a higher tax bracket now so any income you can defer is a good strategy because you may be able to defer it to a point later in life when you are not in as high of a tax bracket.  If, however, you are like Sue and really in  early earning years and likely not in a high tax bracket it is probably better to go with a Roth IRA versus a traditional.  The Roth IRA receives its contributions from after tax dollars and this contribution as well as the earnings are not taxed when withdrawn as long as they are withdrawn after age 59 1/2.  Many people recommend a Roth IRA in this situation because it allows you to take care of the taxes up front and not worry about the impact of your AGI and associated tax bracket when you make your withdrawals.  In addition, the earnings grow tax free, with a traditional IRA you must be tax on the earnings as ordinary income when you withdraw them.

Thanks,

Brett

Jessica Arp(Oct 24, 2018 12:44 PM)– Read by: 2

Mark as Read  Reply

Hello Diego,

I found it interesting this week that the scenario did not tell us if Sue was Single, Married, or even if she had any kids.  It always fascinates me how many exemptions there are when it comes to taxes. The lifetime learning credit was one that I had never heard of before.  I tend to use the AOC also known as Hope credit.  The lifetime learning credit would only apply to the cost of tuition and fees.  It would also help professional or graduate tuition as well.   For Sue to save for retirement, she could cut back on frivolous spending.  Cook dinner at home instead of eating Fast food.  The same could be said for lunch and buying expensive overpriced coffee all the time. Sue would only need roughly $25 to start a savings plan or a retirement plan.  There are many options available to Sue when it comes to choosing the right plan for her.  Her best option would probably be to go talk to a Financial Planner and see what advice they could give her.  Since we don’t know her marital status or how much income she has, it would be difficult to suggest how much she should put away.   You did a great job on this week’s forum post, but I would elaborate a little bit more on everything Sue could deduct.

Reference:

Spilker, B. (2015). Taxation of Individuals and Business Entities Edition 6e.  McGraw-Hill, Inc.