Research Report Assignment | Homework Help Websites
Using your favorite search engine, conduct research on a well-known leader of a corporation. You might be interested in researching formers leaders such as Lee Iacocca of Chrysler, Herb Kelleher of Southwest Airlines, Jack Welch of General Electric, or Ray Kroc of McDonald’s. Alternatively, you could research present-day corporate leaders such as Indra Nooyi of PepsiCo, Mary Barra of GM, Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, Gregory Hayes of United Technologies, etc. Remember, the leader you choose to research doesn’t have to be on this list — pick a leader who piques your curiosity! Some students have chosen the CEO of their own employers, but please be sure that you have a minimum of two sources in addition to your textbook if you do so.
Review articles and biographical information that is available on the Internet. You should have a minimum of two (2) sources in addition to your textbook. The goal of your research is to answer the following questions about the leader you chose:
- Based upon your research, what type of behavioral leadership style does/did the individual practice? Task-oriented, people-oriented, or a combination of the two? Explain.
- How would this individual’s leadership style be characterized in terms of the path-goal theory of leadership? Explain.
- Would you describe this individual as a transactional or transformational leader? Explain.
- In what specific ways do you feel this individual was an effective leader?
- In what specific ways do you feel this individual’s leadership could be improved?
This report should be a minimum of 3 full pages (double-spaced – approximately 750 words), excluding header, cover page and/or references, using 12-point font and 1-inch margins.
Keep in mind that, while there are no “absolutely correct” answers for these questions, this is not an opportunity for opinion alone. Grading will reflect your reasoning and critical thinking skills, your ability to integrate what you have assimilated from material presented in lecture, the textbook and other learning materials, the clarity of your response and its appearance. Please see the rubric attached (and posted in the “Additional Resources” folder, which can be accessed in the Key Information area of the Blackboard informational site) for detailed expectations of this assignment.
Be sure to cite your sources according to either APA or MLA formatting. Information about APA and MLA formatting is posted in the “Additional Resources” folder, which can be accessed in the Key Information area of the Blackboard instructional site. Please also note: Wikipedia is not considered an appropriate source for papers in this course because anyone is allowed to be a contributor to the website and therefore the content is not properly vetted.
REPORT RUBRIC
|
Content – Questions Co |
Opinion |
Spelling, punctuation, and vocabulary |
Total Score |
|
| Exemplary
|
All questions are thoroughly addressed with insightful ideas and arguments that demonstrate critical thinking and extended thought. Multiple ideas are demonstrated. Textual evidence is relevant and thorough.
15 pts. |
Clear and logical statements; explanation and/or examples provided to fully support ideas and opinions; shows insight.
10 points |
All grammar, spelling and punctuation are correct. Complete sentences are used, along with extensive vocabulary.
5 points |
|
| Above average | Questions are fully answered, demonstrating thought on each question. Important points are discussed and ideas are correctly understood. Relevant textual evidence
12-14 pts. |
Clear statements with appropriate examples or explanations to adequately support ideas and opinions.
9 points |
Contains a few grammar, spelling and/or punctuation errors. Complete sentences are used, along with effective vocabulary.
4 pts. |
|
| Average | Answers are adequate, demonstrating some thought on questions, but some possible ideas or arguments are not developed. Textual evidence is relevant, but may not be sufficient to adequately support ideas and arguments.
10-11 pts. |
Reasonably clear statements with adequate explanations or examples to support most ideas and opinions.
7 – 8 pts. |
Some grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Complete sentences are used, but may not always be clearly written. Vocabulary is adequate, but may use words in incorrect applications.
3 pts. |
|
| Poor | Answers are brief and do not demonstrate extended or thought on questions. Textual evidence is not relevant or too sparse to offer sufficient support of the argument.
7 – 9 pts. |
Minimally supports ideas and opinions with explanations or examples.
4 – 6 pts. |
Several grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Sentences may be incomplete, and many words used in incorrect situations.
2 pts. |
|
| Unacceptable | Answers to questions mechanical, superficial, or simple restatements of fact, or some questions are left unanswered.
0-6 pts. |
Little or no support of ideas and opinions.
0 – 3 pts. |
Many grammar, spelling and punctuation errors. Paper is both difficult to read and understand.
0 – 1 pts. |
|
