Research Paper Assignments | Online Homework Help

Overview: For this milestone, you will articulate your final thoughts around your review of the literature and proposed research design. This milestone can be

used as the final section of your Research Investigation final project submission. You will review the instructor feedback and incorporate into your final project

submission. The final project is meant for you to propose a hypothetical study. You are not and should not be conducting human subjects

research for this project. It is not necessary for the purposes of this assignment. All human subjects research requires written approval from the SNHU COCE

Institutional Review Board in order to protect the welfare and ensure ethical treatment of the subjects.

The following elements must be addressed as outlined in the Final Project Guidelines and Rubrics document:

A. Explain why you believe the identified gap in the research should be explored in future research.

B. Explain how the claims made by the authors of the studies presented in your chosen track would logically inform future research into your identified

gap.

C. Explain the benefit of the research you have proposed to the field of psychology.

Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a one-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins.

This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.

Critical Elements

Exemplary

Proficient

Needs Improvement

Not Evident

Research Plan: Gap

Meets “Proficient” criteria, and response demonstrates an advanced ability to identify gaps in research   20 / 20

Research Plan: Research Question

Meets “criteria, and developed research question demonstrates a keen insight into how to develop research questions that address gaps in research  20 / 20

Research Design: Research Design

Does not determine a research design that addresses the research question

0 / 20

Criterion Feedback

I could not provide any points here as you were wrong on many levels:

1) not qualitative

2) not descriptive, but correlational

3) IV and DV are only designated for an experiment

4) There are more than 2 types of design for descriptive research

Research Design: Issues of Ethics

Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation demonstrates an astute ability to account for issues of ethics within proposed research design   15 / 15

Research Design: Informed

Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation demonstrates keen insight regarding how issues of ethics are accounted for in various scenarios   15 / 15

Articulation of Response

Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format   10 / 10