Professional Development and Retention Assignment | Homework Help Websites
Hr003: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND RETENTION
Recruiting and training staff is a costly and time-consuming enterprise. As a result, a key focus of human resources is retention of staff. It is not easy to predict what strategies will be effective for different staff members. What is meaningful to one may be less so to another. The human resources responsibility is to develop an assortment of strategies that are most likely to have the greatest impact on a wide spectrum of employees. How do you create an environment where employees want to work? With your selected organization in mind, prepare a Retention Strategies Report that could be utilized in the organization. Your report should include the following (3–5 pages):
- Describe the healthcare organization and its goals for retention.
- Describe three specific retention strategies that are working for this organization, and explain why they are effective.
- Evaluate specific challenges this organization has faced regarding retention.
- Analyze gaps in retention efforts this organization is faced with. Explain the ramifications of the gaps.
- Consider what the organization is planning to do to close the gap, and recommend three retention strategies that might be effective in promoting retention in this workplace. Explain why you think the strategies would be effective in closing the gap in the retention strategies in in this organization.
How does a human resources (HR) department know in which areas it is effective and which need improvement? How does it know if retention strategies are working, hiring costs are in line, performance goals are met, and training/development hours are appropriately allocated and achieved? There are many metrics that can be applied to obtain important human resources-related data and some will be more critical than others to a specific organization. For Part 2 of your Retention Strategies Report, outline the metrics that can be applied to the organization. (4–5 pages). Include the following:
- Describe human resources metrics currently being used to evaluate outcomes of human resources functions in your organization. Explain how they are of value to the organization.
- Identify gaps in the metrics being used. Analyze what is happening as a result of these gaps.
- Consider what the organization has planned for changing their metrics, and then recommend five human resources metrics that would provide data of particular value to the organization. Include at least one metric that addresses retention and onethat addresses professional development.
- Describe how you would apply the data collected from each of these metrics to improve human resources outcomes.
Part 3: Professional Development
Professional development opportunities within an organization can cover widely diverse areas; greatly impact employee satisfaction and production; influence retention; and help ensure a balanced, informed, skilled, and compliant workforce. Professional development offerings are prompted by many factors, including legally mandated content required of all employees, such as sexual harassment training in some states, EEEO training, training for specific positions that involves certification or licensing, compliance with professional regulatory organizations, and organizational training on a myriad of job-specific topics. The human resources manager needs to know that staff is provided the opportunities they need to succeed both within the organization and as professionals.
As Part 3 of your Retention Strategies Report (5–8 pages):
- Describe key training for at least three different positions (e.g., nurses, radiology technicians, etc.), required of the organization by state or federal regulations.
- Describe at least three training and/or certifications required by relevant accrediting bodies and professional organizations.
- Describe training/professional development opportunities currently being used by the organization that are providing value. Analyze how they are providing value to the organization and/or individual.
- Identify gaps in the training/professional development program. Recommend training/professional development opportunities that would fill those gaps. Explain how.
- Describe four training delivery methods that might be most viable in your organization. Include at least two technology-based methods. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of each.
- Recommend two training delivery options for the organization. Explain your rationale for these recommendations. Include influence of the organization’s mission, vision, and values on making these selections.
Laureate Education (Producer). (2014a). How to observe children [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Talent Retention: Six Technology-Enabled Best Practices
Oracle. (2012). Talent retention: Six technology-enabled best practices [White Paper]. Retrieved from http://www.oracle.com/us/media1/talent-retention-6-best-practices-1676595.pdf
Retaining Talent: A Guide to Analyzing and Managing Employee Turnover
Allen, D. G. (2008). Retaining talent: A guide to analyzing and managing employee turnover. Retrieved from https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/trends-and-forecasting/special-reports-and-expert-views/Documents/Retaining-Talent.pdf
Quits Are Up: 7 Employee Retention Strategies Your Company Must Have
Conerly, B. (2013). Quits are up: 7 employee retention strategies your company must have. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/billconerly/2013/12/11/quits-are-up-7-employee-retention-strategies-your-company-must-have/
Martin, J., & Schmidt, C. (May 2010). How to keep your top talent. Retrieved from https://enterprisersproject.com/sites/default/files/How%20to%20Keep%20Your%20Top%20Talent_1.pdf
For this Exploration, select a specific organization, preferably one in which you work or are very familiar. Consider retention strategies used by this organization as you complete the following:
- Briefly describe the organization (without identifying it).
- Describe one specific retention strategy that is working for this organization, and explain why it is effective.
- Describe one specific challenge this organization has faced regarding retention. Evaluate and explain why the organization is facing this challenge.
- Identify one gap in retention efforts this organization is faced with. What is one ramification of this gap?
- Finally, recommend one strategy that might be effective in promoting retention in this workplace. Explain why this strategy might be effective in closing the gap in the retention strategies in this organization.
How does human resources (HR) management know if its organization is appropriately staffed and well positioned to address future staffing needs? How does an organization know if compensation rates are appropriate and competitive? How does HR track turnover rates or turnover and recruitment costs? All of these issues and many more are within the purview of HR and all can be informed by applying appropriate metrics.
It is essential for a manager to be familiar with various types of calculations that can assist with measuring HR-related concerns. Read Chapters 13, 14, 15, and Appendix A with these thoughts in mind.
- Chapter 13, “Workforce Planning in a Rapidly Changing Healthcare System”
- Chapter 14, “The Nurse Workforce in Healthcare Organizations”
- Chapter 15, “Human Resources Management Practices for Quality and Patient Safety”
- Appendix A, “Human Resources Metrics”
Fried, B. J., &Fottler, M. D. (Eds.). (2015). Human resources in healthcare: Managing for success (4th ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.
How to Compute a Firm’s Incidence Rate for Safety Management
U.S. Department of Labor. (n.d.-a). How to compute a firm’s incidence rate for safety management. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/iif/osheval.htm
Improving Performance Evaluations Using Calibration
Miller, S. (2014). Improving performance evaluations using calibration. Employment law, employee relations, credentialing, and organizational development are all key HR issues that healthcare managers must understand and appropriately address if an organization is to meet its strategic goals. Consider the relevance of these topics to your own professional goals as a manager.
- Chapter 2, “Employment Law, Employee Relations, and Healthcare”
- Chapter 4, “Credentialing of Healthcare Providers”
- Chapter 11, “Organizational Development and Learning”
Fried, B. J., &Fottler, M. D. (Eds.). (2015). Human resources in healthcare: Managing for success (4th ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.
The Affordable Care Act is influencing many employer responsibilities with regard to provision of healthcare to employees. Managers need to be aware of the ramifications of new requirements and impact on costs. The following report looks at opportunities within this environment for strategic change.
PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2014). An HR perspective: The future of healthcare benefits—Employers’ opportunity for strategic change in the new healthcare world. Retrieved from http://www.pwc.com/en_US/us/hr-management/publications/assets/hr-perspectives-healthcare-roundtables.pdf
To yield productive results, learning, training, and professional development cannot be approached haphazardly. Within healthcare organizations today, learning must be viewed as a continual process, and opportunities have to be provided for targeted continual development. Healthcare managers today need a solid understanding of the value of training and the variety of delivery methods available. The resources provide guidance.
Learning, Training & Development: Implementing An Employee Training & Development Program
HR Council. (n.d.). Learning, training & development: Implementing an employee training & development program. Retrieved from http://hrcouncil.ca/hr-toolkit/learning-implementing.cfm
Any manager, within any healthcare organization, needs to have a working understanding of key U.S. labor laws. An overview is provided.
Summary of the Major Laws of the Department of Labor
U.S. Department of Labor. (n.d.-b). Summary of the major laws of the department of labor. Retrieved from http://www.dol.gov/opa/aboutdol/lawsprog.htm
There are many opportunities to improve an organization’s HR functions, and it is important for a manager to be able to identify gaps for process improvement. The following resource provides an approach for human resource management assessment.
Human Resources Management Assessment Approach
Marsden, P., Caffrey, M., & McCaffery, J. (2013). Human resources management assessment approach. Retrieved from http://www.capacityplus.org/files/resources/hrm-assessment-approach.pdf
The Joint Commission. (2015). About The Joint Commission. Retrieved from http://www.jointcommission.org/about_us/about_the_joint_commission_main.aspx
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (n.d.) Health information privacy. Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/index.html
HR003: Professional Development and Retention: Evaluate a healthcare organization’s practices for retaining talent and providing professional development and recommend strategies for improvement.
Assessment Rubric
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
Not Present | Needs Improvement | Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations | ||||
Part I: Retention Strategies | |||||||
Sub-Competency 1: Evaluate retention strategies for healthcare organizations. | |||||||
Learning Objective 1.1: | Description of the | Description of the | Description of the | Demonstrates the same | |||
Describe an organization | organization and its | organization vaguely or | organization clearly | level of achievement as | |||
and its goals for | retention goals is missing. | incompletely indicates the | indicates the type of | “2” plus the following: | |||
retention. | type of organization, | organization, employee | |||||
employee demographics, | demographics, and | Response describes recent | |||||
and description of the | description of the | issues or trends that have | |||||
population the | population the | impacted retention in this | |||||
organization serves. | organization serves. | organization. | |||||
Organization goals for | |||||||
retention are relevant to | |||||||
improving retention. | |||||||
Learning Objective 1.2: | Description of retention | Response describes fewer | Response clearly describes | Demonstrates the same | |||
Describe effective | strategies is missing. | than three retention | at least three specific | level of achievement as | |||
retention strategies. | strategies that are working | retention strategies that | “2” plus the following: | ||||
for an organization or the | are working for an | ||||||
descriptions are vague. | organization. | Response describes | |||||
rationale for why the | |||||||
strategies are working. | |||||||
Learning Objective 1.3: | Explanation of retention | Response explains fewer | Response clearly explains | Demonstrates the same | |||
Explain retention | challenges is missing. | than three retention | at least three specific | level of achievement as | |||
challenges in healthcare | challenges the | challenges the | “2” plus the following: | ||||
organizations. | organization has faced and | organization has faced | |||||
lacks sufficient explanation | regarding retention. | ||||||
©2014 Walden University | 1 |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Not Present | Needs Improvement | Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations | |
regarding these | Response describes recent | |||
challenges. | Response explains the | issues or trends that have | ||
sources of these | impacted retention in this | |||
challenges. | organization. | |||
Learning Objective 1.4: | Description of gaps in | Response identifies fewer | Response identifies at | Demonstrates the same |
Analyze gaps in | retention strategies is | than three gaps in | least three HR gaps within | level of achievement as |
retention strategies. | missing. | retention strategies. | the organization. | “2” plus the following: |
Response insufficiently | Response explains the | Response describes a | ||
and/or unclearly explains | ramifications of these gaps | reason why each of these | ||
the ramifications of the | on the organization. | gaps might exist in the | ||
gaps. | organization. | |||
Learning Objective 1.5: | Recommendation of | Response recommends | Response recommends at | Demonstrates the same |
Recommend strategies | strategies for promoting | fewer than three valid | least three valid strategies | level of achievement as |
for promoting | retention is missing. | strategies for promoting | for promoting retention | “2” plus the following: |
retention. | retention. | |||
Rationale explains why | Response describes | |||
Rationale insufficiently | these strategies will help | potential barriers or | ||
supports | close the gaps. | constraints to | ||
recommendations. | implementing these | |||
strategies. | ||||
Part 2: Retention Metrics
Sub-Competency 2: Evaluate human resource metrics.
Learning Objective 2.1: | Description of metrics is | Response describes fewer | Response describes at |
Explain how human | missing. | than five metrics to | least five metrics that are |
resources metrics are | evaluate outcomes of | being used to evaluate | |
proving value to an | human resources (HR) | outcomes of HR functions | |
organization. | functions. | in the organization. |
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2” plus the following:
©2014 Walden University | 2 |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
Not Present | Needs Improvement | Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations | ||
Response explains how the | |||||
Explanation of value of | Response explains why | selection of these | |||
these metrics to the | these metrics are of value | particular metrics aligns | |||
organization is not well | to this organization. | with the organization’s | |||
supported. | strategies and goals. | ||||
Learning Objective 2.2: | Analysis of gaps in metrics | Response describes fewer | Response describes at | Demonstrates the same | |
Analyze gaps in the | is missing. | than three gaps in metrics. | least three gaps in the | level of achievement as | |
metrics. | metrics. | “2” plus the following: | |||
Response insufficiently | |||||
and/or unclearly analyzes | Response clearly and | The response includes one | |||
what is happening as a | accurately analyzes what is | additional example from | |||
result of these gaps. | happening as a result of | another industry outside | |||
these gaps. | of healthcare | ||||
Learning Objective 2.3: | Recommendation of | Response recommends | Response recommends at | Demonstrates the same | |
Recommend human | metrics is missing. | fewer than five human | least five human resources | level of achievement as | |
resources metrics. | resources metrics. | metrics. | “2” plus the following: | ||
At least one recommended | The response includes one | ||||
matric addresses retention | additional example from | ||||
and one addresses | another industry. | ||||
professional development. | |||||
Learning Objective 2.4: | Description of the | Response does not clearly | Response clearly and | Demonstrates the same | |
Describe the | application of data | or sufficiently explain how | sufficiently explains how | level of achievement as | |
application of data | collected is missing. | data from five metrics | data from five metrics | “2” plus the following: | |
collected. | could be applied to | could be applied to | |||
improve human resources | improve human resources | Response explains | |||
outcomes. | outcomes. | constraints that might be | |||
faced in applying data | |||||
collected. | |||||
©2014 Walden University | 3 |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
Not Present | Needs Improvement | Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations | ||
Part 3: Professional Development | |||||
Sub-Competency 3: Evaluate opportunities and methods for training and professional development within a healthcare organization | |||||
Learning Objective 3.1: | Description of required | Response describes fewer | Response describes at | Demonstrates the same | |
Describe training | training is missing. | than three key trainings | least one key training | level of achievement as | |
required of a | required by state or | required by state or | “2” plus the following: | ||
healthcare | federal regulations. | federal regulations for | |||
organization by state | each of three different | Response describes factors | |||
or federal regulations. | Descriptions of trainings | positions. | that influence the | ||
are unclear and/or | receptiveness of staff to | ||||
inaccurate. | federal or state mandated | ||||
training. | |||||
Learning Objective 3.2: | Description of required | Response describes fewer | Response clearly and | Demonstrates the same | |
Describe training | training is missing. | than three trainings and/or | accurately describes at | level of achievement as | |
and/or certifications | certifications required by | least three trainings | “2” plus the following: | ||
required by key | key accrediting bodies and | and/or certifications | |||
accrediting bodies and | professional organizations. | required by key accrediting | Response describes how | ||
professional | bodies. | the training is proving | |||
organizations. | Descriptions of trainings | value to the organization | |||
are unclear and/or | and/or the individual. | ||||
inaccurate. | |||||
Learning Objective 3.3: | Analysis of | Response describes fewer | Response describes at | Demonstrates the same | |
Analyze | training/professional | than two professional | least two professional | level of achievement as | |
training/professional | development | development | development | “2” plus the following: | |
development | opportunities that provide | opportunities provided by | opportunities provided by | ||
opportunities that | value to an organization is | the organization. | the organization that are | Response clearly describes | |
provide value to an | missing. | providing value. | four optimal methods for | ||
organization. | Analysis of value to the | conducting training that | |||
organization and/or | Analysis of value to the | add value to the | |||
individual is unclear and | organization and/or | organization and their | |||
poorly stated. | individual is clear and well | impact | |||
stated. | |||||
©2014 Walden University | 4 |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
Not Present | Needs Improvement | Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations | ||
Learning Objective 3.4: | Recommendation for | Response does not | Response accurately | Demonstrates the same | |
Recommend | training/professional | accurately identify gaps in | identifies gaps in | level of achievement as | |
training/professional | development is missing. | training/professional | training/professional | “2” plus the following: | |
development | opportunities. | opportunities. | |||
opportunities. | Response explains | ||||
Recommendations for | Recommendations for | constraints that might be | |||
training/professional | training/professional | faced when enacting these | |||
development | development | training/professional | |||
opportunities do not align | opportunities align with | development | |||
with the caps in the | the caps in the | opportunities. | |||
organization. | organization. | ||||
Learning Objective 3.5: | Response is missing. | Response describes fewer | Response describes four | Demonstrates the same | |
Describe viable | than four delivery | delivery methods, at least | level of achievement as | ||
training/professional | methods. | two of which are | “2” plus the following: | ||
development delivery | technology based. | ||||
methods for a | Response insufficiently or | Response explains how | |||
healthcare | inaccurately describes | Response describes three | different methods of | ||
organization. | advantages and | advantages of each | delivery can ensure equal | ||
disadvantages of delivery | delivery option and | opportunity in accessing | |||
options. | explains why they are | learning. | |||
advantages. | |||||
Response describes three | |||||
disadvantages of each | |||||
delivery option and | |||||
explains why they might | |||||
be disadvantages. | |||||
Learning Objective 3.6: | Recommendation of | Response does not clearly | Response accurately | Demonstrates the same | |
Recommend | professional | or accurately describe the | describes two | level of achievement as | |
professional | development/training | recommended delivery | “2” plus the following: | ||
©2014 Walden University | 5 |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
Not Present | Needs Improvement | Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations | ||
development/training | delivery methods to a | methods; the rationale is | recommended delivery | ||
delivery methods to a | healthcare organization is | not well supported, and/or | methods. | Response describes a | |
healthcare | missing. | alignment to | future-oriented training | ||
organization. | organizational mission, | Rationale for the | delivery method that | ||
vision and values is | recommendations is well | might not be viable now, | |||
missing. | supported. | but is likely to become so | |||
in the future. Provides a | |||||
Alignment of the | look ahead. | ||||
recommendations to the | |||||
organization’s mission, | |||||
values and vision is | |||||
provided. | |||||
PS001: Written Communication: Demonstrate graduate-level writing skills. | |||||
Learning Objective | Multiple major and minor | Multiple minor errors in | Writing reflects competent | Grammar, spelling, and | |
PS 1.1: | errors in grammar, | grammar, spelling, and/or | use of standard edited | mechanics reflect a high | |
Use proper grammar, | spelling, and/or mechanics | mechanics are distracting | American English. | level of accuracy in | |
spelling, and | are highly distracting and | and negatively impact | standard American English | ||
mechanics. | seriously impact | readability. | Errors in grammar, | and enhance readability. | |
readability. | spelling, and/or mechanics | ||||
do not negatively impact | |||||
readability. | |||||
Learning Objective | Writing is poorly organized | Writing is loosely | Writing is generally well- | Writing is consistently | |
PS 1.2: | and incoherent. | organized. Limited use of | organized. Introductions, | well-organized. | |
Organize writing to | Introductions, transitions, | introductions, transitions, | transitions, and | Introductions, transitions, | |
enhance clarity. | and conclusions are | and conclusions provides | conclusions provide | and conclusions are used | |
missing or inappropriate. | partial continuity. | continuity and a logical | effectively to enhance | ||
progression of ideas. | clarity, cohesion, and flow. | ||||
Learning Objective | APA conventions are not | APA conventions for | APA conventions for | APA conventions for | |
PS 1.3: | applied. | attribution of sources, | attribution of sources, | attribution of sources, | |
Apply APA style to | structure, formatting, etc., | structure, formatting, etc., | structure, formatting, etc., | ||
written work. | are applied inconsistently. | are generally applied | are applied correctly and | ||
©2014 Walden University | 6 |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Not Present | Needs Improvement | Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations | |
correctly in most | consistently throughout | |||
instances. Sources are | the paper. Sources are | |||
generally cited | consistently cited | |||
appropriately and | appropriately and | |||
accurately. | accurately. | |||
Learning Objective | Vocabulary and tone are | Vocabulary and tone have | Vocabulary and tone are | Vocabulary and tone are |
PS 1.4: | inappropriate and | limited relevance to the | generally appropriate for | consistently tailored to the |
Use appropriate | negatively impact clarity of | audience. | the audience and support | audience and effectively |
vocabulary and tone | concepts to be conveyed. | communication of key | and directly support | |
for the audience and | concepts. | communication of key | ||
purpose. | concepts. |
PS005: Critical Thinking and Problem Solving: Use critical-thinking and problem-solving skills to analyze professional issues and inform best practice.
Learning Objective | Assumptions are missing. | Response does not | Response presents and | Response justifies the |
PS 5.2: | adequately present and | discusses key assumptions | reasonableness and need | |
Generate reasonable | discuss key assumptions in | in an original argument. | for assumptions in an | |
and appropriate | an original argument. | original argument. | ||
assumptions. | ||||
Learning Objective | Assessment of multiple | Response does not identify | Response identifies and | Response justifies |
PS 5.3: | perspectives is missing. | nor adequately consider | considers multiple | selection of chosen |
Assess multiple | multiple perspectives or | perspectives and | alternative relative to | |
perspectives and | alternatives. | alternatives. | others. | |
alternatives. | ||||
Learning Objective | Problems and solutions are | Response presents | Response presents | Response presents |
PS 5.4: | not identified. | solutions, but they are | solutions that are practical | compelling supporting |
Use problem-solving | ineffective in addressing | and work in addressing the | arguments for proposed | |
skills. | the specific problem. | specific problem. | solutions. |
HR003: Professional Development and Retention: Evaluate a healthcare organization’s practices for retaining talent and providing professional development and recommend strategies for improvement.
Assessment Rubric
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
Not Present | Needs Improvement | Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations | ||||
Part I: Retention Strategies | |||||||
Sub-Competency 1: Evaluate retention strategies for healthcare organizations. | |||||||
Learning Objective 1.1: | Description of the | Description of the | Description of the | Demonstrates the same | |||
Describe an organization | organization and its | organization vaguely or | organization clearly | level of achievement as | |||
and its goals for | retention goals is missing. | incompletely indicates the | indicates the type of | “2” plus the following: | |||
retention. | type of organization, | organization, employee | |||||
employee demographics, | demographics, and | Response describes recent | |||||
and description of the | description of the | issues or trends that have | |||||
population the | population the | impacted retention in this | |||||
organization serves. | organization serves. | organization. | |||||
Organization goals for | |||||||
retention are relevant to | |||||||
improving retention. | |||||||
Learning Objective 1.2: | Description of retention | Response describes fewer | Response clearly describes | Demonstrates the same | |||
Describe effective | strategies is missing. | than three retention | at least three specific | level of achievement as | |||
retention strategies. | strategies that are working | retention strategies that | “2” plus the following: | ||||
for an organization or the | are working for an | ||||||
descriptions are vague. | organization. | Response describes | |||||
rationale for why the | |||||||
strategies are working. | |||||||
Learning Objective 1.3: | Explanation of retention | Response explains fewer | Response clearly explains | Demonstrates the same | |||
Explain retention | challenges is missing. | than three retention | at least three specific | level of achievement as | |||
challenges in healthcare | challenges the | challenges the | “2” plus the following: | ||||
organizations. | organization has faced and | organization has faced | |||||
lacks sufficient explanation | regarding retention. | ||||||
©2014 Walden University | 1 |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Not Present | Needs Improvement | Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations | |
regarding these | Response describes recent | |||
challenges. | Response explains the | issues or trends that have | ||
sources of these | impacted retention in this | |||
challenges. | organization. | |||
Learning Objective 1.4: | Description of gaps in | Response identifies fewer | Response identifies at | Demonstrates the same |
Analyze gaps in | retention strategies is | than three gaps in | least three HR gaps within | level of achievement as |
retention strategies. | missing. | retention strategies. | the organization. | “2” plus the following: |
Response insufficiently | Response explains the | Response describes a | ||
and/or unclearly explains | ramifications of these gaps | reason why each of these | ||
the ramifications of the | on the organization. | gaps might exist in the | ||
gaps. | organization. | |||
Learning Objective 1.5: | Recommendation of | Response recommends | Response recommends at | Demonstrates the same |
Recommend strategies | strategies for promoting | fewer than three valid | least three valid strategies | level of achievement as |
for promoting | retention is missing. | strategies for promoting | for promoting retention | “2” plus the following: |
retention. | retention. | |||
Rationale explains why | Response describes | |||
Rationale insufficiently | these strategies will help | potential barriers or | ||
supports | close the gaps. | constraints to | ||
recommendations. | implementing these | |||
strategies. | ||||
Part 2: Retention Metrics
Sub-Competency 2: Evaluate human resource metrics.
Learning Objective 2.1: | Description of metrics is | Response describes fewer | Response describes at |
Explain how human | missing. | than five metrics to | least five metrics that are |
resources metrics are | evaluate outcomes of | being used to evaluate | |
proving value to an | human resources (HR) | outcomes of HR functions | |
organization. | functions. | in the organization. |
Demonstrates the same level of achievement as “2” plus the following:
©2014 Walden University | 2 |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
Not Present | Needs Improvement | Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations | ||
Response explains how the | |||||
Explanation of value of | Response explains why | selection of these | |||
these metrics to the | these metrics are of value | particular metrics aligns | |||
organization is not well | to this organization. | with the organization’s | |||
supported. | strategies and goals. | ||||
Learning Objective 2.2: | Analysis of gaps in metrics | Response describes fewer | Response describes at | Demonstrates the same | |
Analyze gaps in the | is missing. | than three gaps in metrics. | least three gaps in the | level of achievement as | |
metrics. | metrics. | “2” plus the following: | |||
Response insufficiently | |||||
and/or unclearly analyzes | Response clearly and | The response includes one | |||
what is happening as a | accurately analyzes what is | additional example from | |||
result of these gaps. | happening as a result of | another industry outside | |||
these gaps. | of healthcare | ||||
Learning Objective 2.3: | Recommendation of | Response recommends | Response recommends at | Demonstrates the same | |
Recommend human | metrics is missing. | fewer than five human | least five human resources | level of achievement as | |
resources metrics. | resources metrics. | metrics. | “2” plus the following: | ||
At least one recommended | The response includes one | ||||
matric addresses retention | additional example from | ||||
and one addresses | another industry. | ||||
professional development. | |||||
Learning Objective 2.4: | Description of the | Response does not clearly | Response clearly and | Demonstrates the same | |
Describe the | application of data | or sufficiently explain how | sufficiently explains how | level of achievement as | |
application of data | collected is missing. | data from five metrics | data from five metrics | “2” plus the following: | |
collected. | could be applied to | could be applied to | |||
improve human resources | improve human resources | Response explains | |||
outcomes. | outcomes. | constraints that might be | |||
faced in applying data | |||||
collected. | |||||
©2014 Walden University | 3 |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
Not Present | Needs Improvement | Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations | ||
Part 3: Professional Development | |||||
Sub-Competency 3: Evaluate opportunities and methods for training and professional development within a healthcare organization | |||||
Learning Objective 3.1: | Description of required | Response describes fewer | Response describes at | Demonstrates the same | |
Describe training | training is missing. | than three key trainings | least one key training | level of achievement as | |
required of a | required by state or | required by state or | “2” plus the following: | ||
healthcare | federal regulations. | federal regulations for | |||
organization by state | each of three different | Response describes factors | |||
or federal regulations. | Descriptions of trainings | positions. | that influence the | ||
are unclear and/or | receptiveness of staff to | ||||
inaccurate. | federal or state mandated | ||||
training. | |||||
Learning Objective 3.2: | Description of required | Response describes fewer | Response clearly and | Demonstrates the same | |
Describe training | training is missing. | than three trainings and/or | accurately describes at | level of achievement as | |
and/or certifications | certifications required by | least three trainings | “2” plus the following: | ||
required by key | key accrediting bodies and | and/or certifications | |||
accrediting bodies and | professional organizations. | required by key accrediting | Response describes how | ||
professional | bodies. | the training is proving | |||
organizations. | Descriptions of trainings | value to the organization | |||
are unclear and/or | and/or the individual. | ||||
inaccurate. | |||||
Learning Objective 3.3: | Analysis of | Response describes fewer | Response describes at | Demonstrates the same | |
Analyze | training/professional | than two professional | least two professional | level of achievement as | |
training/professional | development | development | development | “2” plus the following: | |
development | opportunities that provide | opportunities provided by | opportunities provided by | ||
opportunities that | value to an organization is | the organization. | the organization that are | Response clearly describes | |
provide value to an | missing. | providing value. | four optimal methods for | ||
organization. | Analysis of value to the | conducting training that | |||
organization and/or | Analysis of value to the | add value to the | |||
individual is unclear and | organization and/or | organization and their | |||
poorly stated. | individual is clear and well | impact | |||
stated. | |||||
©2014 Walden University | 4 |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
Not Present | Needs Improvement | Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations | ||
Learning Objective 3.4: | Recommendation for | Response does not | Response accurately | Demonstrates the same | |
Recommend | training/professional | accurately identify gaps in | identifies gaps in | level of achievement as | |
training/professional | development is missing. | training/professional | training/professional | “2” plus the following: | |
development | opportunities. | opportunities. | |||
opportunities. | Response explains | ||||
Recommendations for | Recommendations for | constraints that might be | |||
training/professional | training/professional | faced when enacting these | |||
development | development | training/professional | |||
opportunities do not align | opportunities align with | development | |||
with the caps in the | the caps in the | opportunities. | |||
organization. | organization. | ||||
Learning Objective 3.5: | Response is missing. | Response describes fewer | Response describes four | Demonstrates the same | |
Describe viable | than four delivery | delivery methods, at least | level of achievement as | ||
training/professional | methods. | two of which are | “2” plus the following: | ||
development delivery | technology based. | ||||
methods for a | Response insufficiently or | Response explains how | |||
healthcare | inaccurately describes | Response describes three | different methods of | ||
organization. | advantages and | advantages of each | delivery can ensure equal | ||
disadvantages of delivery | delivery option and | opportunity in accessing | |||
options. | explains why they are | learning. | |||
advantages. | |||||
Response describes three | |||||
disadvantages of each | |||||
delivery option and | |||||
explains why they might | |||||
be disadvantages. | |||||
Learning Objective 3.6: | Recommendation of | Response does not clearly | Response accurately | Demonstrates the same | |
Recommend | professional | or accurately describe the | describes two | level of achievement as | |
professional | development/training | recommended delivery | “2” plus the following: | ||
©2014 Walden University | 5 |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
Not Present | Needs Improvement | Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations | ||
development/training | delivery methods to a | methods; the rationale is | recommended delivery | ||
delivery methods to a | healthcare organization is | not well supported, and/or | methods. | Response describes a | |
healthcare | missing. | alignment to | future-oriented training | ||
organization. | organizational mission, | Rationale for the | delivery method that | ||
vision and values is | recommendations is well | might not be viable now, | |||
missing. | supported. | but is likely to become so | |||
in the future. Provides a | |||||
Alignment of the | look ahead. | ||||
recommendations to the | |||||
organization’s mission, | |||||
values and vision is | |||||
provided. | |||||
PS001: Written Communication: Demonstrate graduate-level writing skills. | |||||
Learning Objective | Multiple major and minor | Multiple minor errors in | Writing reflects competent | Grammar, spelling, and | |
PS 1.1: | errors in grammar, | grammar, spelling, and/or | use of standard edited | mechanics reflect a high | |
Use proper grammar, | spelling, and/or mechanics | mechanics are distracting | American English. | level of accuracy in | |
spelling, and | are highly distracting and | and negatively impact | standard American English | ||
mechanics. | seriously impact | readability. | Errors in grammar, | and enhance readability. | |
readability. | spelling, and/or mechanics | ||||
do not negatively impact | |||||
readability. | |||||
Learning Objective | Writing is poorly organized | Writing is loosely | Writing is generally well- | Writing is consistently | |
PS 1.2: | and incoherent. | organized. Limited use of | organized. Introductions, | well-organized. | |
Organize writing to | Introductions, transitions, | introductions, transitions, | transitions, and | Introductions, transitions, | |
enhance clarity. | and conclusions are | and conclusions provides | conclusions provide | and conclusions are used | |
missing or inappropriate. | partial continuity. | continuity and a logical | effectively to enhance | ||
progression of ideas. | clarity, cohesion, and flow. | ||||
Learning Objective | APA conventions are not | APA conventions for | APA conventions for | APA conventions for | |
PS 1.3: | applied. | attribution of sources, | attribution of sources, | attribution of sources, | |
Apply APA style to | structure, formatting, etc., | structure, formatting, etc., | structure, formatting, etc., | ||
written work. | are applied inconsistently. | are generally applied | are applied correctly and | ||
©2014 Walden University | 6 |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Not Present | Needs Improvement | Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations | |
correctly in most | consistently throughout | |||
instances. Sources are | the paper. Sources are | |||
generally cited | consistently cited | |||
appropriately and | appropriately and | |||
accurately. | accurately. | |||
Learning Objective | Vocabulary and tone are | Vocabulary and tone have | Vocabulary and tone are | Vocabulary and tone are |
PS 1.4: | inappropriate and | limited relevance to the | generally appropriate for | consistently tailored to the |
Use appropriate | negatively impact clarity of | audience. | the audience and support | audience and effectively |
vocabulary and tone | concepts to be conveyed. | communication of key | and directly support | |
for the audience and | concepts. | communication of key | ||
purpose. | concepts. |
PS005: Critical Thinking and Problem Solving: Use critical-thinking and problem-solving skills to analyze professional issues and inform best practice.
Learning Objective | Assumptions are missing. | Response does not | Response presents and | Response justifies the |
PS 5.2: | adequately present and | discusses key assumptions | reasonableness and need | |
Generate reasonable | discuss key assumptions in | in an original argument. | for assumptions in an | |
and appropriate | an original argument. | original argument. | ||
assumptions. | ||||
Learning Objective | Assessment of multiple | Response does not identify | Response identifies and | Response justifies |
PS 5.3: | perspectives is missing. | nor adequately consider | considers multiple | selection of chosen |
Assess multiple | multiple perspectives or | perspectives and | alternative relative to | |
perspectives and | alternatives. | alternatives. | others. | |
alternatives. | ||||
Learning Objective | Problems and solutions are | Response presents | Response presents | Response presents |
PS 5.4: | not identified. | solutions, but they are | solutions that are practical | compelling supporting |
Use problem-solving | ineffective in addressing | and work in addressing the | arguments for proposed | |
skills. | the specific problem. | specific problem. | solutions. |