Network Eavesdropping on Personal Conversations Assignment | Buy assignments online
- Network Eavesdropping on Personal Conversations
Suppose you were the network administrator of a hosting provider and discover that law enforcement was eavesdropping on personal conversations crossing the wire in an IP telephony system. What biblical principles are relevant as you consider what to do when you find out about the practice? Does it make a difference if they got a court order authorizing the activity – and is this different from the CIA analyst Edward Snowden case that occurred in 2013?
You are required to provide a thread in response to the provided prompt for each forum. Each thread must be at least 350 words and demonstrate course-related knowledge. Submit your thread by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday and your replies by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday.
Grading Rubric for Discussion Board and Group Discussion Board
50 Points
| Criteria | Levels of Achievement | |||
| Content
70% |
Advanced | Proficient | Developing | Not present |
| Post:
Content Based on Topic (21 points) |
19 – 21 points
Post addresses the topic thoroughly, including every part and provides examples, support and attachments as directed. Includes biblical integration supported by scripture and use of external references or personal examples. |
18points
Post addresses the topic and provides some examples and support. Post lacks biblical integration or use of external references or personal examples. |
1 – 17 points
Post inadequately addresses the topic, biblical integration, use of external references or personal examples. |
0 points
Post does not address the topic at all. |
| Replies:
Content Based on Topic (14 points) |
13-14 points
Two or more replies address the topic thoroughly, including every part and provides examples, support and feedback as directed. |
12 points
Two or more replies address the topic including some examples and support. |
1 – 11points
Replies inadequately address the topic or there is only one reply.
|
0 points
Replies do not address the topic at all or there are no replies at all. |
| Structure
30% |
Advanced | Proficient | Developing | Not present |
| Writing and
Word Count (15points) |
14-15points
Post is well written with no errors in spelling or grammar and contains a minimum of 350 words in APA format.Replies are well written with no errors in spelling or grammar. The replies contain a minimum of 250 words.
|
13 points
Post is well written but has 1-2 errors in spelling or grammar. Post has 300-349 words- but not in APA format.The replyis well written but has 1-2 errors in spelling or grammar. Replies contain less than 100-249 words.
|
1 – 12 points
Post and/or reply are not well written. They have more than 3-4 errors in spelling or grammar.The post has less than 300 words and/or the replies have less than 100 words.
|
0 points
Post and/or replies are not present, well written, and/or have5 or more errors in spelling or grammar. |
