Human Resource policy | Online Assignment Help

Submission method options: Alternative submission method Task back to top This assignment is worth 45% of the total marks for this subject. This assessment task relates to all 6 Learning Objectives for the subject. Continuing with your chosen firm and country used in Assessment Item 2, you will now need to prepare a second report for the company which: recommends the most appropriate entry mode, corporate and business level strategy and human resource approach outlines the international strategy for the company/organisation outlines the multinational structure for the company/organisation; and provides recommendations for motivating and leading cross cultural staff. The structure of your report is outlined in the “Presentation” section below. Online submission via Turnitin is required for this assignment. Details will be provided by your subject lecturer. Rationale back to top This assessment task will work towards assessing the following learning outcome/s: be able to evaluate the implications for managing teams and businesses in a globalised world. be able to evaluate the main theories, concepts and models of culture and use these theories to make recommendations regarding management of cross-cultural communication, negotiation and conflict resolution in a multi-cultural team environment. be able to investigate cultural differences in relation to decision making, motivation and leadership and recommend management strategies for Human Resource policy and leadership of cross-cultural teams. be able to effectively communicate recommendations regarding the viability, form and function of a firm’s international operations. This assessment task is designed to: encourage independent research into the cross-cultural management issues of doing business in a particular country allow you to apply your understanding of macro-economic issues when recommending strategies for international operations provide you with experience in writing an authentic workplace report that includes recommendations and justifications which are based on research and analysis. Marking criteria and standards back to top Marking Criteria CRITERION Fail (FL) / Poor/ unacceptable/ Not attempted/ requires further development/ needs improvement < 50 Pass (PS)/ Acceptable/ Satisfactory/ Proficient – 50 to 64 Credit (CR)/ Good/ Well done 65 to 74 Distinction (DI)/ Very good/ exceeds 75 to 84 High Distinction (HD)/ Excellent/ exemplary/ exceeding high standard. 85 or above 1 – Executive Summary (2 marks) The executive summary was missing or poorly constructed e.g. it acted as a table of contents or introduction outlining what the report contained rather than summarising the key findings. Summarised some key findings but still reads more like an introduction than an Executive Summary (i.e. “the report will cover …” rather than “the report found that…. ) ES provides a summary of most of the key findings in the report. Some discussion of implications included. A good summary of the key findings in the report was provided. The report provides an informed discussion of the implications of these findings in terms of risks and opportunities. Provided a concise yet comprehensive summary of the findings of the report. Findings for all important factors were provided in the summary. Discussion of implications demonstrates strong understanding of macro environmental risks and opportunities. 2 – Introduction – covering scope of report and summary of key macro issues arising from previous report. (5 marks) The introduction did not highlight the scope of the report. Summary of key macro issues missing or poorly constructed. Scope of the report outlined. Key macro areas identified but not well defined and implications not addressed or addressed superficially. Scope of the report outlined clearly. Information on key macro issues clearly identified and implications identified. Clear links between previous report and current report. Scope of the report clearly articulated. Information on key macro issues clearly identified and implications discussed. Clear links between previous report and current report. Scope of the report clearly articulated. Information on key macro issues concisely and clearly identified and implications discussed. Discussion shows expert ability to synthesize information to present a clear exposition of knowledge. Clear links between previous report and current report. 3 – Strategy recommendations & justification for corporate, business level strategy, multinational structure and entry mode (12 marks) Recommended strategies missing or not supported by findings from macro environment and firm situation. Recommended strategies are reasonable and generally supported by findings from macro environment and firm situation. Recommendations are mentioned but not that clear or supported. Recommended entry mode, corporate, business strategies are appropriate and justified in relation to macro environment, company size, strategy and resources. Recommendations are included. Recommended entry mode, corporate and business strategies are appropriate and justified in relation to macro environment, company size, strategy and resources. The recommendations are clear and supported. Recommended entry mode, corporate and business strategies are appropriate and well justified in relation to macro environment, company size, strategy and resources. Discussion shows expert ability to synthesize information to present a clear exposition of knowledge. The recommendations are clear & well supported. 4 – Strategy recommendations & justification for HR approach (10 marks) Recommended HR strategies missing or not supported by findings from target country cultural environment and firm situation Recommended HR strategies are reasonable and generally supported by findings from target country cultural environment and firm situation Recommended HR strategies are appropriate and justified in relation to target country cultural environment, company size, strategy and resources. Recommended HR strategies are appropriate and justified in relation to target country cultural environment, company size, strategy and resources. HR policy also takes into consideration cultural findings, firm strategy and wider macro issues. Recommended HR strategies are appropriate and well justified in relation to target country cultural environment, company size, strategy and resources. HR policy also takes into consideration cultural findings, firm strategy and wider macros issues. Discussion shows expert ability to synthesize information to present a clear exposition of knowledge. 5 – Evaluation of motivation and leadership issues facing international managers and recommendation for approach. (5 marks) Demonstrates little understanding of the complexity of motivating and leading staff across cultures. Limited or no discussion of theoretical frameworks. No recommendations. Shows evidence of research and provides good discussion of cultural issues likely to impact on motivation and leadership. Lacks strong analysis using cultural frameworks. Few recommendations for international manager. Demonstrates good research into the chosen culture. Clearly identifies important cultural aspects likely to impact on motivation and leadership such as values, attitudes and communication styles. Uses theoretical frameworks to support the analysis. Provides some recommendations. Demonstrates good research into the chosen culture. Clearly evaluates important cultural aspects likely to impact on motivation and leadership such as values, attitudes and communication styles. Uses theoretical frameworks to support the analysis. Provides good recommendations that are clear and supported. Demonstrates thorough research into the chosen culture. Effectively synthesizes information to identify important elements. Provides and insightful analysis into deeper aspects of culture such as values, attitudes and communication styles and their impact on motivation and leadership. Effectively uses theoretical frameworks to draw connections and discusses implications for international managers. Provides excellent recommendations that are clear and well supported 6 – Strategy recommendations & justification for marketing strategies (3 marks) Recommended strategies missing or not supported by findings from macro environment, cultural issues and firm situation. Recommended strategies are reasonable and generally supported by findings from macro environment, cultural issues and firm situation. Recommended marketing strategies are appropriate and justified in relation to macro environment, cultural issues, company size, strategy and resources. Recommended marketing strategies are appropriate and justified in relation to macro environment, company size, strategy and resources and take into consideration cultural findings, firm capabilities and wider macros issues. Recommended marketing, strategies are appropriate and well justified in relation to macro environment, company size, strategy and resources. Strategies also take into consideration cultural findings, firm strategy and wider macros issues. Discussion shows expert ability to synthesize information to present a clear exposition of knowledge. 7 –Structure, organisation, presentation and grammar (3 marks) The report was unprofessional, unclear and not well structured. Table of contents, headings, page numbers etc were missing or inconsistent. Meaning unclear and/or grammar and/or spelling contained frequent errors. The report was neat and well structured. Presentation mostly follows guidelines ie 1.5 spacing, page numbers, easy to read font. Reference list on separate page. Some minor issues. Meaning apparent but language not always fluent. Some spelling and grammatical errors. The report was neat and well structured. Presentation follows guidelines ie 1.5 spacing, page numbers, easy to read font. Reference list on separate page Language mainly fluent. Grammar and spelling mainly accurate. Organisation and presentation was of report was of a professional, standard. Presentation follows guidelines. Fluent writing style. Grammar and spelling accurate. Organisation and presentation was of an excellent standard. Presentation follows guidelines. Fluent writing style. Grammar and spelling accurate. 8 – Research and referencing (5 marks) Referencing needed improvement. Sources were uncited / poorly cited / demonstrated little attempt to comply with APA6 system. Reliance on few and/or poor quality sources. There was likely a reliance on one source of literature. Referencing was of a satisfactory standard. An attempt was made to use the APA6 method of referencing. Some errors evident e.g. page numbers missing from direct quotations. Overall references were presented reasonably clearly in the reference list, using a consistent format (not missing many references). Used a variety of authentic information sources. Referencing was of a good standard. Most citations follow APA6 method of referencing. These references were presented reasonably clearly in the reference list, using a consistent format (not missing many references). Used a variety of authentic information sources. Referencing was of a high standard. Majority of citations and references in reference list conform to APA6 standard. Used a variety of authentic and appropriate information sources and texts. Excellent referencing with majority of citations correctly adhering to APA6 method. Comprehensive reference list. Wide variety of authentic and appropriate sources used in appropriate context. Marks out of 45. Value 45% Presentation back to top The structure of your report should be as follows: 1. Executive Summary (a 2 page (maximum) summary of key findings, strategies and outcomes). 2. Table of Contents 3. Introduction to the report, brief background to company 4. Brief summary of key macro issues relevant to country: ie a synopsis of Part A of your report on the macro environment (Topics 1-6). NB this should only be 1-2 pages maximum in length 5. Recommendation for entry mode with justifications why this method is being recommended (Topic 8). 6. International strategy for company (Topic 7). 7. Multinational structure for company (Topic 9) 8. Methods and strategies for motivation and leadership of cross cultural teams (Topic 11) 9. HR recommendations (takes into account the cultural aspects of the country, the strategy of the firm and the various options available). (Topic 10) 10.Marketing considerations (Topic 12) 11. Conclusion 12. References in APA6 format The following points are also an important guide for presenting assessment items: Create a cover page for the assignment including a title, your name and student ID. Use 1.5 spacing. Use a standard 12 point font such as Times New Roman, Calibri or Arial. Left-justify body text. Use headings for the activities. Always cite and reference all sources of information used in assessments. Provide a single reference list (“References”) that always starts on a new page. (eg “Ctrl+Enter”). Citations and reference list to be in APA6 format. Requirements back to top Citations and reference list are to be in APA 6th referencing format Always keep a copy of your assessments. Most importantly, always use your spelling and grammar checker. Remember this does not pick up all errors, so you must also manually and carefully edit your work. Submit your assessment in a WORD format (not PDF or Pages). This assignment must be submitted through Turnitin. It is recommended that your name, student ID and page number are included in the header or footer of every page of the assignment. Further details about submission in Turnitin are provided in On-line submission. Assessment Information back to top Academic integrity Academic integrity means acting with honesty, fairness and responsibility, and involves observing and maintaining ethical standards in all aspects of academic work. This subject assumes that you understand what constitutes plagiarism, cheating and collusion. If you are a new student we expect you to complete the modules called Academic Integrity at CSU. CSU treats plagiarism seriously. We may use Turnitin to check your submitted work for plagiarism. You can use Turnitin to check for plagiarism in your assessments before submission. Referencing back to top Referencing is an important component of academic work. All assessment tasks should be appropriately referenced. The specific details of the referencing requirements are included in each assessment task description. Get referencing style guides and help to use for your assessments.