For sir_excellence only | Law homework help

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Assignment on
For sir_excellence only | Law homework help
Just from $13/Page
Order Now




Due by Sunday. please read the details twice and be sure to include all the points.


Interview from 60 Minutes with Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. This video sheds light on the issue of affirmative action, a policy central to the debate about rights in the United States. It also provides insight into the politics associated with the nomination and confirmation of Supreme Court justices.  At the time, Thomas had just published an autobiographical book, My Grandfather’s Son, about his growing up dirt poor in the south, how his grandparents and especially his grandfather influenced him as a child and his education and career path to the Supreme Court.  

The paper assignment based on the interview and other parts of the reading should be 5 pages ATLEAST, double spaced with 12 font and have about 300 words per page. It should be prepared in Word.  The paper should provide a detailed summary of the interview and a discussion about what you have learned about affirmative action policies as it relates to the process of nominating and confirming Supreme Court justices. Use details from the interview in your paper. What is the “elephant in the room”, as Thomas describes it to Steve Kroft?  What do you make of the episode involving Anita Hill and Thomas’ comment to the Senate Judiciary Committee that the proceedings were a “high tech lynching of an uppity black who deigns to think for himself”?   Why did he say that?

Your paper should also discuss Grutter v. Bollinger and especially what Thomas wrote in his dissent Grutter v. Bollinger examined the constitutionality of the affirmative action admissions policy used by the University of Michigan Law School. The case raised the question of whether it was permissible for the law school to use race as a factor in its selection process. Those opposed to such affirmative action policies argued that, as Justice Harlan wrote in dissent in Plessy v. Ferguson (the 1896 case we examined earlier in the course where the Court created the “separate but equal” doctrine), the Constitution should be “color blind”. In other words, opponents argue that to give preference to African American students (or women in the Grutter case) is no more constitutional than were the policies using race in the past to segregate minorities in schools etc. In effect, those opposed to affirmative action argue that race should not be a factor at all in university admissions policies. In effect, this was the argument in  Fisher v. Texas decided in June 2013.  In Fisher, the Supreme Court avoided having to re-examine the affirmative action issue raised in Grutter by focusing instead on the equal protection standard to be applied in such issues and sending the case back to the lower courts for further review.  In 2016 the Supreme Court again ruled Fisher v. Texas this time upholding the University of Texas’ use of race in its admissions policy.  In 2014, the Supreme Court ruled that Michigan could amend its state constitution by banning affirmative action admission policies in its state universities (Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action).


Additional Material:

  • Actual link to Grutter v. Bollinger; It will help to examine the case through this link paying particular attention to Justice O’Connor’s opinion of the court and Justice Thomas’ dissent. The link under Reading leads to Oyez.org where you can listen to the oral arguments presented by the attorneys who argued the case before the Supreme Court. You can also listen to the questions posed to the attorneys by the justices as well as their interactions over the issues raised in the case. Oyez is a great resource for this, and other Supreme Court cases, and I placed it here so you can obtain a deeper understanding of the issues relating to affirmative action in higher education. Another recent case dealing with affirmative action in higher education, Fisher v. Texas, was decided by the Supreme Court in 2013.  The Michigan affirmative action debate was addressed again by the Supreme Court in Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action (2014). For a discussion about the Schuette case see
  • http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/23/us/supreme-court-michigan-affirmative-action-ban.html?_r=0 
  • Schuette is an important case since the Supreme Court upheld a Michigan state constitutional amendment banning the use of affirmative action in the admissions policies of public state universities.



Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Homework Writing Services
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Military science
Some of the paper did not tie into the topic, and was used to fill space. Overall, happy with the end result.
Customer 462263, November 29th, 2021
Health Care
Thank you very much!
Customer 454001, February 8th, 2020
Very good job.
Customer 456821, April 8th, 2022
Good job
Customer 463245, February 6th, 2023
Good work.
Customer 463049, June 5th, 2022
Health Care
It is exactly my expectation. Thank you.
Customer 454755, June 30th, 2020
Thank you very much
Customer 452763, December 6th, 2021
Customer 463813, March 8th, 2023
English 101
Excellent work.
Customer 460547, April 5th, 2022
Excellent work. Had a few issues but tutor stayed in contact and produced a succinct and quality paper.
Customer 453939, April 26th, 2020
Excellent work!
Customer 463337, March 7th, 2023
Public Health
Good work
Customer 452657, February 14th, 2020
Customer reviews in total
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
Customers referred by a friend
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat