fbpx

Ethical Business | Online Assignment Help

Read Case Study 1: Leading an Ethical Business: Dilmah Tea Waddell, D et al (2017) Organisational Change: Development & Transformation, Cengage Learning, pp. 450-451. Prepare a case study analysis report on this case: What are the key issues that this case raises for managing organisational change? Does your team consider that this firm’s focus on ethics and corporate social responsibility is not feasible or appropriate for businesses operating in other industries such as financial services, manufacturing, transport, media. Why or why not? Murdoch University 19 Can your team recommend ways that other businesses could adopt some of the principles and practices of the case study firm? Assignment 2: Marking rubric for the Team case study report. Mark High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail Criteria 1: Depth & breadth of research. /10 Excellent depth and breadth of research. Location of broad range of data and views on issues raised by the case. Very good depth and breadth of research, a range of relevant sources are used in the assignment. Good depth and breadth of research. Uneven research, some points are well researched, others need development. Satisfactory level and depth of research. Tendency to rely on a small number of sources which limits perspectives and analysis. Insufficient evidence of research, case study relies on one or two sources (often secondary rather than primary). Criteria 2: Critical analysis of case study firm, evaluating key issues raised in the case and evaluating the relevance & feasibility of solutions raised in the case to other firms. /10 Excellent, deep level of analysis. Provides an extremely comprehensive analysis of the key issues raised by the case & evaluates the relevance & feasibility of the solutions proposed in the case to other firms (other industries, countries, size etc). Very good analysis. Provides a very good analysis of the key issues raised by the case & evaluates the relevance & feasibility of the solutions proposed in the case to other firms (other industries, countries, size etc). Good analysis. Provides a good analysis of the key issues raised by the case & evaluates the relevance & feasibility of the solutions proposed in the case to other firms (other industries, countries, size etc). Satisfactory analysis. Displays rudimentary attempt to analyse key issues raised by the case. Depth and breadth of analysis is uneven, one element may be rigorously analysed while other elements need deeper and more comprehensiv e analysis. Weak level of analysis. Displays no evidence of understanding key issues raised in the case. Instead the assignment describes the case. Criteria 3: case study provides recommendatio ns for future directions for the case study firm. /5 Excellent, develops detailed recommendation s of how and why the case study firm could develop in the future. Very good, Recommendation s could be improved with presentation of additional supporting data, or stronger explanation of how obstacles could be overcome. Presents several recommendation s however needs to strengthen the links between the recommendation s and the body of the case study. Additional evidence or consideration of tactics for implementation, methods of adaption or when to stop or replace strategy needed. Satisfactory analysis however there is a major flaw in the case study, either its focus is too narrow, so elements are not investigated, or too broad leading to superficial analysis. Unsatisfactory case study describes firm’s actions and industry rather than critically evaluating its current and future operations for managing change. Criteria 4: Case study is logically structured, well written, argument is supported by evidence, Chicago references used. /10 Excellent professional comprehensive case study analysis. Well written, clear, coherent structure with individual sections linked to each other. Points are substantiated Very good case study analysis, overall standard is high but there is one element or section which needs development perhaps it is missing supporting data, hasn’t considered potential Good case study analysis, solid standard is high but there are two or more elements or sections which needs development perhaps it is missing supporting data, hasn’t considered potential Satisfactory case study however there is several areas of weakness: disorganised random structure, weak expression, points made not supported Unsatisfactory , weak structure and organisation. Lacks a sustained developed argument – no links between sections, difficult to read and follow. Weak 20 Murdoch University with relevant evidence correctly cited. scenarios, or the actions of new market entrants with disruptive business models. scenarios, or the actions of new market entrants with disruptive business models. by appropriate references correctly cited. expression, or doesn’t cite references correctly. Criteria 5: Case study provides evidence of the teamwork process including leadership, decisionmaking, the contribution of each team member to the project. /5 Excellent detailed evidence of teamwork processes and contribution of each team member to decision-making and production of final case study. Transcripts of What’s App, Google Hanghouts, Facebook Messenger etc. Very good evidence of team work processes, clearly shows how and whom decisions were made and which team member wrote particular parts of the case study. However, one element needs improvement – how was conflict resolved, how did the team deal with ‘free loaders’. Good evidence of team work processes, shows how and whom decisions were made and which team member wrote particular parts of the case study. However, several elements need improvement – who led the project, how was conflict resolved, how did the team deal with ‘free loaders’ or team members leaving the team. Satisfactory evidence of team work processes, however need to strengthen and or clarify one or two aspects: leadership, task, role allocations, time schedule, decision making, conflict resolution, negotiation etc. Unsatisfactory , no evidence presented to indicate teamwork processes or which team members worked on particular elements of the case study.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Assignment on
Ethical Business | Online Assignment Help
Just from $13/Page
Order Now
Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Homework Writing Services
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
English 101
Always use Grammarly before submitting your papers.
Customer 462495, April 6th, 2022
Finance/Acc related
Great job!
Customer 460073, August 14th, 2022
Nursing
Excellent work again. Thanks!!!
Customer 453939, March 24th, 2020
Nursing
Excellent!!!
Customer 453939, June 27th, 2020
Nursing
2 hrs late
Customer 454007, April 12th, 2020
Interior Decoration
Excellent work! We look down to your future contribution
Customer 463463, November 16th, 2022
Medical Terminology
Thank you
Customer 454783, April 12th, 2022
Other
Great work.
Customer 462927, May 24th, 2022
Nursing
I received my paper early and it is very well written. Thank you!!
Customer 462821, April 6th, 2022
Social Sciences
None
Customer 453751, June 14th, 2020
Humanities
On point.
Customer 463131, July 6th, 2022
Finance/Acc Related
Good concept breakdown.
Customer 460073, July 9th, 2022
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat