fbpx

Economic History of Western Europe Study Guide | Online Assignment Help

RESEARCH PAPER INSTRUCTIONS ECONOMICS 5130

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Assignment on
Economic History of Western Europe Study Guide | Online Assignment Help
Just from $13/Page
Order Now

OVERVIEW You will produce a 10-12 page research paper (about 3,000-3,600 words of main text) for this course. Your research paper will:

– briefly review the relevant literature – motivate an original hypothesis – test that hypothesis with an original analysis

(analytically, empirically, or narratively) – contain a bibliography of all sources – contain an appendix of charts, graphs, tables, etc., as

appropriate

The methods to test a hypothesis are numerous, e.g. mathematical models, regression analysis, other statistical tests, reviews and interpretations of the narrative historical evidence, etc. Choose a method suitable to your hypothesis. As this is an economic history course, you are HIGHLY ENCOURAGED to do a quantitative analysis. You must turn in a research proposal outlining your hypothesis and methods for testing clearly. The research proposal is worth 20 points toward the 200 points total for your research paper. See the syllabus proposal due date. You will turn in a paper copy of your research paper on the last day of class at 8:00 am, using one stable in the upper left-hand corner. LIBRARY RESOURCES For our Sept. 19th, 2018 lecture, Professor Hilary Bussell, the Economics Librarian at the Ohio State University will guest lecture about using library resources to find peer-reviewed academic journal articles. Please attend with your laptop or tablet as you will be trying these tools out yourself in an activity. TOPICS Your topic should:

– be European in nature – be historical (i.e. about a time period before 1950) – be economic in nature – NOT be a topic covered in-depth during lecture (see

syllabus for a list of topics covered during lecture)

SOURCES You should use at least FIVE academic sources for your research paper. We will discuss what constitutes an acceptable academic source during the semester. Sources on the syllabus reading list do not count. The OSU library’s guide to research in economics is at the following website: http://guides.osu.edu/economics Here is a non-exhaustive list of helpful links to quantitative historical data for Europe: International Historical Statistics http://library.ohio-state.edu/record=e1001436 Time period: Varies, as far back as 1750 Place: Worldwide Statistics: Various demographic, government, financial, fiscal, industrial, infrastructure, trade, aggregate economic time series, etc. GFD Finaeon http://library.ohio-state.edu/record=e1000864 Time period: Varies, as far back as 1200 CE Place: Worldwide Statistics: Financial data. Various bond, stock, real estate, CPI, currency exchange, etc. Note: Must register for account (free via OSU library) Historicalstatistics.org http://www.historicalstatistics.org/ Time period: Varies Place: Major European countries, some limited international Statistics: Various demographic, government, financial, fiscal, industrial, trade, aggregate economic time series, etc. RFE: Resources for Economists on the Internet https://www.aeaweb.org/rfe/showCat.php?cat_id=6 Mainly, a database of databases. Global Price and Income History Group http://gpih.ucdavis.edu/index-main.html Time period: Varies Place: Worldwide Statistics: Various food prices, income estimates, nominal GDP, some government budget

Penn World Table https://www.rug.nl/ggdc/ Time period: 1950-today Place: Worldwide Statistics: Real national income accounts The Maddison Project http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/maddison-project/home.htm Time period: Varies, as far back as 1 CE Place: Worldwide Statistics: Population, GDP, GDP per capita estimates EH.net Databases http://eh.net/databases/ Time period: Varies Place: Mostly UK & USA Statistics: Varies Measuring Worth https://www.measuringworth.com/index.php Great resource for quickly comparing prices across time. Mostly UK & USA. ICPSR http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ The ultimate social science data repository (5,000,000 variables from across 10,500 studies). Demographic, political, social, health, and economic data from research all over the globe. Data on the History of the English Economy, 1150-1914 http://faculty.econ.ucdavis.edu/faculty/gclark/data.html Time period: 1150-1914 Place: England Statistics: Prof. Gregory Clark’s data on living standards, prices, wages, wealth, capital returns, rents, etc. Data and Estimates http://economics.ucdavis.edu/people/fzlinder/peter-linderts- webpage/data-and-estimates Time period: 1600-today Place: Britain, China, some worldwide Statistics: Prof. Peter Lindert’s data on social tables (income distribution), public finances, soil, probates, sovereign debt, etc.

This Time is Different http://www.carmenreinhart.com/this-time-is-different/ Time period: 1800-today Place: Worldwide Statistics: Prof. Carmen Reinhart & Prof. Kenneth Rogoff’s data on debt, defaults, inflation, financial crises, asset prices, financial data, etc. Clio Infra – Research Infrastructure for the study of Global Inequality http://www.cgeh.nl/clio-infra-research-infrastructure-study- global-inequality Time period: 385 BCE-today Place: Worldwide Statistics: Early economies, human capital, institutions (political institutions, democracy index, conflicts & wars, etc.), population, and urbanization data Our World in Data https://ourworldindata.org/ A varied collection of data visualizations. Mostly 20th-21st century. North Atlantic Population Project https://www.nappdata.org/napp/ Time period: 1703-1911 Place: Canada, Denmark, Germany, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States Statistics: Representative microdata samples from historical censuses from 8 countries in the North Atlantic with harmonized variables on household characteristics, demography, occupation, education, residence, etc. IMF Data http://www.imf.org/en/Data Time period: mostly 20th-21st century Place: Worldwide Statistics: Macro time series, financial data, exchange rates, etc. World Bank Open Data http://data.worldbank.org/ Time period: mostly 20th-21st century Place: Worldwide Statistics: Macro time series, developmental indicators, poverty rates, microdata survey data, etc.

World-Historical Dataverse http://www.dataverse.pitt.edu/external/datasets.php A database of databases. Medieval and Early Modern Data Bank http://www2.scc.rutgers.edu/memdb/database_list.html Time period: 800-1815 CE Place: Europe Statistics: Exchange rates, monetary data, grain prices, wages PLAGARISM You will upload an electronic copy of your paper to http://www.turnitin.com for plagiarism review by 11:59 am on the last day of class. Our TurnItIn.com class ID number is 18640013 and the password is “econ” (no quotes, lower case). Please see the “Academic Misconduct” section of the course’s syllabus for course policies and links about plagiarism. I will not accept late proposals or papers without prior arrangements. The grading rubric is below.

NAME: __________________________________________________________ Thesis Motivates report with quick introduction, defines interesting puzzle

/10

Has a strong, non-trivial, falsifiable hypothesis (original)

/10

Function Uses literature review to develop hypothesis

/10 Uses economic theory to support hypothesis

/10 Uses economic evidence to test hypothesis in scientific manner (quantitative or qualitative)

/10 FIVE academic sources (academic books, peer-reviewed journal articles, etc.). Should focus on economics sources. Sources on reading list do not count.

/10 Forceful, short conclusion

/10 Form Clarity

/10 Structure, style, smooth transitions between points, between 10-12 pages

/10 Spelling, grammar, punctuation

/10 Total

/100 Convert to grade points = Rounddown(Total/100 × 180)

/180

5130 Economic History of Western Europe Study Guide -What can economic history teach us about why some countries rich and other countries poor? Economic history can show us how institutions, property rights and how money/income per capita affected countries and their standards of living. Economic theory

• Domar’s trilemma o Free land o Free labor o Aristocracy o Can’t have all three at the same time

because of competition We use history to understand economics

• Data o Test theory

§ Theory open for revision o Duhem Quine o Empirical orientation

§ Do the facts fit? o Use history to understand context

§ Economics is not a natural science § Laws of economics à socially,

historically contingent Comin et. Al

• Finds that there is a strong link between tech level in the past and tech level today for countries (positively correlated)

• Evidence for technology persistence • High tech in the past means high tech in the

future -What is the role of technology in economic growth and development? Is modern technology necessary and/or sufficient for high labor productivity?

In a Malthusian world, technology change does nothing for long run economic growth. Birth rates and death rates are what determined living standards and they always went back to subsistence. Until the industrial/glorious revolution there was no long run growth or increases in GDP per capita Long-run is full of discontinuity, context is always changing, be weary of predictions Mechanisms for persistence of high technology:

• Complimentary technology • Recombination of old technology to make new

technology • Feedback from technology to science • Feedback from technology to lower access costs

for knowledge • Spillover technology from one sector to another • Economies of scale • Economies of scope • Learn by doing

In modern terms, technology is a complement to workers, in some circumstances technology can replace workers, but overall technology is a complement to workers because workers can be much more productive and provide more output with technology So technology is highly related to productivity. Think of a farmer for example, without a tractor a farmer can only get so much done by hand, but with a tractor, the farmer can be 10x more productive Countries that are more technologically developed, are better off economically -What forces explain cross-country variation in living standards today? What is the role of “history” in shaping these forces?

Growth theory can explain these variations: investments in human capital (knowledge),and innovation contribute to growth significantly A lot of forces explain cross-country variation in living standards today Institutions, property rights, government (policies), productivity (GDP), education and technology We learn from history and use the history to shape our world today Adam Smith says good liberal government is what makes countries rich Good government provides defense, rule of law and provide public goods History takes data and makes sense of it and explains why certain things are a certain way History is how people are able to take data from Europe and all around the world and explain why some countries are rich and some are poor -Have the pre-conditions for growth and development changed over time, i.e. is what matters for modern growth different than what matters for early-modern growth? What matters for modern growth is somewhat different than what mattered for early-modern growth. Property rights are necessary for modern growth and were necessary for early-modern growth But for modern growth technology change and innovation, influences modern growth a lot And for early-modern growth (before 1800), technology change didn’t do anything for growth. What matters for modern growth today is technology, human capital, institutions, property rights etc. -How does the Malthusian model differ from the Neoclassical model?

Malthusian model: • Demographic forces determine long-run economic

growth • Technology does nothing for long-run growth • If tech curve shifts out, GDP per capita/living

standards increase in the short run, but since living standards increase, birth rates will ultimately increase and then living standards will ultimately fall back to subsistence

• Poverty is the natural order • Can never have prosperity in the long-run • An increase in prosperity à increases amount of

people and then prosperity falls because of diminishing marginal productivity

• “positive” checks on population • War, disease, famine were preventative checks • Before industrial revolution, Malthusian model

holds true Neoclassical:

• Y = income (GDP) • X = Land • L =Labor • r = rent • w = wage

Y = rX + wL Assume:

• Diminishing marginal productivity • Cobb-douglas specification • Constant returns to scale • Perfectly competitive markets

Under neoclassical model, TFP (total factor productivity) and land-labor ratio determine living standards Increasing number of workers decreases living standards because of diminishing marginal productivity of each worker – average income per worker falls

If I grow TFP: Spend productivity on—

1) Y à better living standard/ income per worker 2) More people (L/X population density) 3) Or some constant / spend productivity on both 1

and 2 but there’s a trade-off Neo-classical model takeaways:

• Government, institutions, education, and technology all affect Y positively

• TFP also has a positive relationship with Y -Be able to make predictions with the Malthusian model using graphs.

-Compare and contrast early-modern (before 1800) living standards within Europe. Before 1800:

• Living standards were low • Demographic forces determined living standards

(Income per capita) and living standards low • Technology did nothing for economic growth in

the long-run • Poverty was the natural calling • Everyone was poor and would result to the

subsistence level eventually • Long-run economic growth was nearly impossible

After 1800:

• After Industrial revolution we get tech change, and increased living standards even though birth rates increase

• We get long-run economic growth and development • Malthusian model was wrong • Living standards increase dramatically

-Compare and contrast early-modern living standards between Europe and Asia. Living standards Europe:

• Poverty was natural order • Standard of living was low • Subsistence would always result • Real wages didn’t reflect labor productivity • Institutional constraints • Up until about 1688 (glorious revolution) living

standards were low and Europe was stuck in the Malthusian trap

Living standards Asia: • Declining dramatically, mainly due to the trade

changing patterns brought about by Europe and Dutch

• Living standards also declined because of climate change

-Based on your reading of the economic history literature, if you were a policy advisor to a developing country, what policies would you suggest to encourage economic development and growth? The policies I would suggest would be: secure property rights, I would also advise competitive markets, and I would also implement policies that promoted technological change and innovation -What are the necessary pre-conditions for growth and development? Are any of these sufficient conditions for growth and development? Property rights are necessary for growth and development Clark argues that pre-modern political regimes are necessary for growth Epstein says they’re not -What are the roles of the following in explaining the “reversal of fortune” in early-modern Europe: o Population Dynamics (Malthusian Trap)

• Malthusian trap is when a population gets roped into this trap where everyone stays at a subsistence level regardless of tech change and increases in living standards

• We go back to this idea that poverty is the natural order, there’s no way out

• The change was for the worse à more people, less land available à lowered living standards

Population (X/L) (X/L) increases à Y increases

(X/L) decreases à Y decreases (X/L) increases à (w/r) increases Land labor ratio is central to the hypothesis & scarcity of workers o Enclosure Create private property Medieval period: Agriculture

• Commons: place where a piece of land where peasants, serfs, had rights to the land (grazing, gathering and gleening)

• Very disorganized • Overlapping jurisdictions • Tragedy of the commons • Highly inefficient

Reversal of fortune: the commons made living standards worse à free rider problem

• Enclosure movement takes commons & turns it into private property

• Increased agriculture productivity o Trade/Empire English take over global trade Trade à economic growth Trade necessary for urbanization Reversal of fortune: Development of trade allowed for growth through urbanization o Representative Government Prevents political power abuse Reversal of fortune: Check power of government à pro-growth institutions & policies which may enhance growth in the long-run Checks power à pro-growth institutions/policies à econ. Growth increased

o Technology 17th scientific revolution/ enlightenment à industrial revolution à take off Reversal of fortune: with technology change and development, leads to higher standards of living and economic growth and leads to industrial revolution o Literacy Reversal of fortune: Skills and talents in workers increased productivity à economic growth Literacy is scarce Skills are important for economy What does all of this imply about the “Great Divergence”? All of the above is going to help push through pre- modern constraints restrained by a malthusian world Divergence- Everyone is poor until 1800 à some countries take off economically Political changes, technology, human capital etc. all lead to economic growth à divergence -What is the relationship between political freedom and early-modern growth? Political & economic freedoms à PROSPERITY “English liberties” -How is omitted variable bias a problem in interpreting simple regression results and in inferring causality? Be able to critique regression results. Leaving out an omitted variable can change the results dramatically. The effects of a variable could

be underestimated/overestimated when another variable is being omitted from the problem. Example: crime rates are higher with higher ice cream sales Omitted variable: weather/ temperature à warmer temperature is probably what is driving higher crime rates CORRELATION DOES NOT IMPLY CAUSALITY -What was the significance of the Glorious Revolution for the English economy? The glorious revolution propelled the English economy into economic development and economic growth And an increase in living standards For English property rights? After glorious revolution, property rights were more secure than ever have been before For the English political system? The glorious revolution kept the crown in check Made the crown keep its word and keep promises Predictability of government increased For the English state? More vetos over policy/actions Increased power/control of wealth holders over state For the English financial system? Government now on a sound fiscal basis Parliament: central role in fiscal policy à new taxes, audit crown funds -Compare and contrast the views of the following authors on their interpretations of the impact of the Glorious Revolution: North and Weingast (1989), Clark (1996), Epstein (2000), Bogart (2011), Cox (2011). N&W:

• Instability & autocratic à Rates of return on private capital

• Winners of revolution are ultimately going to turn and change the way things are

• Crown will need to be held accountable and needs to keep their promises. The institutional changes will alter the incentives of the government in favor of the winners of the revolution

• By holding crown financially responsible, risk will decrease, and security of private rights will increase

• Willingness in lenders increased dramatically and this must show the government’s responsibility and commitment to its agreements

• Monarchies: higher risk default, higher interest rates

• Republics: lower risk default, lower interest rates

Europe’s financial success is what guided their warfare success Basically, N&W argue that, by holding the crown accountable of their debt contracts, ultimately led to increases in mutually financial (loans) benefits that benefited all parties. (crown, parliament) CLARK:

• Private capital markets • Did the Glorious Revolution actually change

anything for private investors? • Says you’d expect a structural break for private

investors à but we don’t see it in the data • For economic growth, are property rights

sufficient enough? à No Clark used data from charities and the data doesn’t seem to fit what N&W are saying Clark argues that nothing is changing in private returns Pre-modern political regime matters EPSTEIN:

• Says pre-modern growth was so patchy because of a lack of republican and parliamentary

institutions in which autocratic rule was restrained by

No empirical evidence that pre-modern political regime matters BOGART:

• Land improvement rights o Markets o Regulatory authority (i.e. crown/parliament) o 1690+ regulatory parliament o decreased power of the crown o Fewer purges after 1688 o Fewer post hoc revisions of rights

COX:

• Argues that increasing the crown’s accountability and credibility didn’t increase financial trade (except in warfare)

• Crown can constantly default and find new loaners

• Ministerial responsibility was an important and key innovation à resolved royal moral hazard

• England then became more successful in war because the holders in equity shares of the business of war had large stakes in the outcome

-Are property rights necessary for economic growth? Are property rights sufficient for economic growth? Property rights necessary for economic growth? –YES Property rights sufficient for economic growth? –NO -What is the relationship between the state, property rights, and economic growth/prosperity? Property rights are needed for economic growth and prosperity à secured property rights à people feel

more secure in protecting their land and being productive on it Political institutions and policies probably (most likely) needed for economic growth and prosperity Need a constrained state that is strong in governing the economy in order for economic growth -Are representative political institutions necessary for economic growth? Political stability and institutions may be needed for economic growth Is political freedom necessary for economic growth? Clark: pre-modern political regime matters for economic growth Epstein: pre-modern political regime does not matter for economic growth -What is jurisdictional fragmentation? Why did it hinder economic growth? Jurisdictional fragmentation- Fragmenting official power The conflicts between district residents and feudal government resulted in determining and affecting how public open spaces are used and managed District residents vs. feudal government and the desire for autonomy or home rule Jurisdictional fragmentation & hindrance on economic growth:

• Increases cost of providing public goods • Increases costs of fiscal extraction • Results in prisoner’s Dilemma & coordination

problems -How did the pre-modern state differ from the modern state?

Pre-modern state: • lacks full soveirgnty • No monopoly power • No property rights • No public goods • No fiscal extraction powers • No universal rights/ liberty freedom

Pre-modern liberties/freedoms • Socially specific • Inequality & status • Contingent transferrable • Aristocrats / nobles have different rules

applied to them than commoners Under Epstein: Pre-Modern—

• Absolutist state Modern liberties:

• Choice, will à action • Social mobility • Freedom of religion, speech • Fundamental equality before the law • Universal • Being alive gives you all these freedoms • Modern liberties are anachronistic

Modern states are associated with property rights, technology advancement and freedoms and rights and also public goods -What was the transportation revolution? Late 17th – early 19th centuries à world where commodities are being traded (coal, grain, pottery etc.) Increases in innovation à improved technological change in transportation & increased transportation investment

Ocean shipping Steam railroads, railways How did it affect economic development? Helped increase economic development

• Ocean shipping o Better organization of docks/boats o Better ships, navigation, improved harbors o Clearing rivers improvement

• Construction of turnpikes • Steam railroad: best way to transport things,

way more efficient and very cheap All of the above made the economy way more productive and efficient, allowing for more output Transportation revolution improved social welfare dramatically Transportation revolution led to the industrial revolution How was it related to changes in political regime? Transportation revolution improved people’s lives by giving them better output and making output more efficient, it increases standard of living by increasing GDP per capita Much like political regimes do -What was the Ancien Régime? Everyone was subject to the king along with being a subject to a member of a province and estate under a political and social system Existed before French revolution How did its institutions inhibit economic growth and development? No property rights, wealth could be exploited from King at any given time No political freedoms, and no institutions benefiting non- royals

-Is a minimal and constrained state necessary for economic growth? Economies that are governed by states that are strong and constrained are able to avoid disastrous economic policies and are able to overcome and solve distorted incentives The constrained states of western Europe is what saved it from fiscal/economic/political traps Adam smith argues that a good liberal (free markets, free people) government is what makes countries rich Good liberal government provides defense, rule of law and public goods Is a minimal and constrained state sufficient for economic growth? Sufficient constrained and minimal states are sufficient for economic growth Markets that are well functioning are required to reach allocative efficiency, but they also require property rights and well enforced government institutions Markets are able to provide the conditions necessary for sustained economic growth Strong constrained states are associated with sustainable economic growth

Calculate your paper price
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Choose Us

Quality Papers

At Myhomeworkwriters.com, we always aim at 100% customer satisfaction. As such, we never compromise o the quality of our homework services. Our homework helpers ensure that they craft each paper carefully to match the requirements of the instruction form.

Professional Academic Writers

With Myhomeworkwriters.com, every student is guaranteed high-quality, professionally written papers. We ensure that we hire individuals with high academic qualifications who can maintain our quality policy. These writers undergo further training to sharpen their writing skills, making them more competent in writing academic papers.

Affordable Prices

Our company maintains a fair pricing system for all academic writing services to ensure affordability. Our pricing system generates quotations based on the properties of individual papers.

On-Time delivery

My Homework Writers guarantees all students of swift delivery of papers. We understand that time is an essential factor in the academic world. Therefore, we ensure that we deliver the paper on or before the agreed date to give students ample time for reviewing.

100% Originality

Myhomeworkwriters.com maintains a zero-plagiarism policy in all papers. As such, My Homework Writers professional academic writers ensure that they use the students’ instructions to deliver plagiarism-free papers. We are very keen on avoiding any chance of similarities with previous papers.

Customer Support 24/7

Our customer support works around the clock to provide students with assistance or guidance at any time of the day. Students can always communicate with us through our live chat system or our email and receive instant responses. Feel free to contact us via the Chat window or support email: support@myhomeworkwriters.com.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

You will get a personal manager and a discount.
We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Homework Writing Services

My Homework Writers holds a reputation for being a platform that provides high-quality homework writing services. All you need to do is provide us with all the necessary requirements of the paper and wait for quality results.

Essays

Essay Writing Services

At My Homework Writers, we have highly qualified academic gurus who will offer great assistance towards completing your essays. Our homework writing service providers are well-versed with all the aspects of developing high-quality and relevant essays.

Admissions

Admission and Business Papers

With Myhomeworkwriters.com, we will help you secure a position at your desired institution. Our essay writing services include the crafting of admissions papers. We will still help you climb your career ladder by helping you write the official papers that will help you secure a job. We will guide you on how to write an outstanding portfolio or resume.

Editing

Editing and Proofreading

Myhomeworkwriters.com has a professional editorial team that will help you organize your paper, paraphrase it, and eliminate any possible mistakes. Also, we will help you check on plagiarism to ensure that your final paper posses quality and originality.

Coursework

Technical papers

My Homework Writers harbors professional academic writers from diverse academic disciplines. As such, we can develop homework writing services in all academic areas. The simplicity or complexity of the paper does not affect the quality of homework writing services.