Description Paper Assignment | Homework Help Websites
Week 5 – Final Assignment
Prior to working on this assignment, review your work on Part 1 of the Final Assignment from Week 3, and integrate any instructor feedback you received. Review the grading rubric for this assignment to fully understand the grading criteria. Additionally, these resources from Week 3 remain helpful:
- Assigned chapters in the textbook
- Intro to Epidemiology Study Types(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. video
- Introduction to Epidemiology and Public Health(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. video
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. website
- World Health Organization(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. website
This is a continuation of your Final Assignment. In Week 3, you worked on Significant Contributions to Public Health Final Assignment Part 1. This week, Part 2 involves an analysis of how your individual’s contribution from the past continues to contribute to today’s public health system, and how it might guide future work within the industry. As you recall, in Week 3, you researched an individual and their contribution to community and public health. Now, you need to review the feedback given to you from Week 3 and make the necessary revisions to Part 1 of this project.
Your Week 3 assignment should have included each of the following elements:
- Describe Margaret Sanger
- Analyze the climate of the time period in terms of political, socioeconomic, environmental, and technological context in which this person worked.
- Examine the personal beliefs of your person that prompted this work.
- Examine how this individual overcame any adversities to succeed.
- Describe the final outcome of this individual’s contribution to community or public health.
- Explain what this person’s contribution did for overall community or public health at the time.
- Explain why this contribution was so important at that particular point in history.
Use the outline below to organize your paper. Do not type the “Steps” into your paper or presentation. Rather, formulate a well thought out analysis with logical transitions as you would a professional paper or presentation. The grading rubric will be your guide for all the points you need to address in your final submission. Research and critical thinking is a large component of this project. You will curate resources to support your statements using proper APA Style (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
This week you will be adding the second half to your project by completing the following steps:Margaret Sanger
- Step 1: Integrate Significant Contributions to Public Health Final Assignment Part 1 from Week 3, including any revisions based on feedback you received.
- Step 2: Examine the individual’s contribution to community or public health.
- Step 3: Analyze the impact of your individual’s contribution on today’s public health system.
- TIP: You are asking, “What happened as a result of this contribution at the national and community level?” For example, some elements you could address include:
- Did it change attitudes?
- Did it change protocols and policies?
- Did behavior change result?
- Did it add or eliminate laws?
- Step 4: Analyze how this contribution is still relevant today.
- TIP: Was this contribution only applicable at the time it occurred, or is it still applied today? Why or why not? Explain your response.
- Step 5: Examine how this contribution could support or be expanded for future community and public health benefits.
- TIP: Using solid critical thinking, look at the historical value of the contribution and examine how it could be used for the future (is it applicable to another health issue, can it lead to more policy change, could it promote advocacy work or public health laws, etc.).
- TIP: You are asking, “What happened as a result of this contribution at the national and community level?” For example, some elements you could address include:
You have a choice of which format you wish to present your findings. You can choose either a written paper or a presentation format. Follow the instructions for the option you choose below.
Written Paper Format
The Significant Contributions to Public Health Final Project, Part 2
- Must be six double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Writing Center’s APAStyle.
- Must include a separate title page with the following:
- Title of paper
- Student’s name
- Course name and number
- Instructor’s name
- Date submitted
- Must utilize academic voice.
- Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.
- Must use at least eight scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
- Must document any information used from sources in APA style as outlined in the Writing Center.
- Total Possible Score: 24.00
- Describes the Selected Person’s Experience
- Total: 2.00
- Distinguished – Comprehensively describes the selected person’s experience.
- Proficient – Describes the selected person’s experience. Minor details are missing.
- Basic – Minimally describes the selected person’s experience. Relevant details are missing.
- Below Expectations – Attempts to describe the selected person’s experience; however, significant details are missing.
- Non-Performance – The description of the selected person’s experience is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions
- Analyzes the Climate of the Time Period in Terms of the Political, Socioeconomic, Environmental, and Technological Contexts in Which this Person Worked
- Total: 2.00
- Distinguished – Comprehensively analyzes the climate of the time period in terms of the political, socioeconomic, environmental, and technological contexts in which this person worked.
- Proficient – Accurately analyzes the climate of the time period in terms of the political, socioeconomic, environmental, and technological contexts in which this person worked. Minor details are missing.
- Basic – Minimally analyzes the climate of the time period in terms of the political, socioeconomic, environmental, and technological contexts in which this person worked. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.
- Below Expectations – Attempts to analyze the climate of the time period in terms of the political, socioeconomic, environmental, and technological contexts in which this person worked; however, significant details are missing and inaccurate.
- Non-Performance – The analysis of the climate of the time period in terms of the political, socioeconomic, environmental, and technological contexts in which this person worked is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
- Examines the Personal Beliefs of the Person that Prompted His/Her Work
- Total: 2.00
- Distinguished – Comprehensively examines the personal beliefs of the person that prompted his/her work.
- Proficient – Examines the personal beliefs of the person that prompted his/her work. Minor details are missing.
- Basic – Minimally examines the personal beliefs of the person that prompted his/her work. Relevant details are missing.
- Below Expectations – Attempts to examine the personal beliefs of the person that prompted his/her work; however, significant details are missing.
- Non-Performance – The examination of the personal beliefs of the person that prompted his/her work is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
- Examines How this Individual Overcame Any Adversities to Succeed in His/Her Task
- Total: 2.00
- Distinguished – Comprehensively examines how this individual overcame any adversities to succeed in his/her task.
- Proficient – Examines how this individual overcame any adversities to succeed in his/her task. Minor details are missing
- Basic – Minimally examines how this individual overcame any adversities to succeed in his/her task. Relevant details are missing.
- Below Expectations – Attempts to examine how this individual overcame any adversities to succeed in his/her task; however, significant details are missing.
- Non-Performance – The examination of how this individual overcame any adversities to succeed in his/her task is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
- Describes the Final Outcome of this Individual’s Contribution to Community and/or Public Health
- Total: 2.00
- Distinguished – Thoroughly describes the final outcome of this individual’s contribution to community and/or public health.
- Proficient – Describes the final outcome of this individual’s contribution to community and/or public health. Minor details are missing.
- Basic – Minimally describes the final outcome of this individual’s contribution to community and/or public health. Relevant details are missing.
- Below Expectations – Attempts to describe the final outcome of this individual’s contribution to community and/or public health; however, significant are missing.
- Non-Performance – The description of the final outcome of this individual’s contribution to community and/or public health is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
- Explains What His/Her Contribution did for Overall Community and/or Public Health at the Time
- Total: 2.00
- Distinguished – Thoroughly explains what his/her contribution did for overall community and/or public health at the time.
- Proficient – Explains what his/her contribution did for overall community and/or public health at the time. Minor details are missing
- Basic – Minimally explains what his/her contribution did for overall community and/or public health at the time. Relevant details are missing.
- Below Expectations – Attempts to explain what his/her contribution did for overall community and/or public health at the time; however, significant details are missing.
- Non-Performance – The explanation of what his/her contribution did for overall community and/or public health at the time is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
- Explains Why this Contribution was So Important at that Particular Point in History
- Total: 2.00
- Distinguished – Thoroughly explains why this contribution was so important at that particular point in history.
- Proficient – Explains why this contribution was so important at that particular point in history. Minor details are missing.
- Basic – Minimally explains why this contribution was so important at that particular point in history. Relevant details are missing.
- Below Expectations – Attempts to explain why this contribution was so important at that particular point in history; however, significant details are missing.
- Non-Performance – The explanation of why this contribution was so important at that particular point in history is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
- Analyzes the Impact of their Individual’s Contribution on Today’s Public Health System
- Total: 2.00
- Distinguished – Effectively analyzes the impact of their individual’s contribution on today’s public health system.
- Proficient – Analyzes the impact of their individual’s contribution on today’s public health system. Some minor details are missing.
- Basic – Analyzes the impact of their individual’s contribution on today’s public health system. Some relevant details are missing.
- Below Expectations – Attempts to analyze the impact of their individual’s contribution on today’s public health system. Some relevant details are missing or incorrect.
- Non-Performance – The analysis of the impact of their individual’s contribution on today’s public health system is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
- Analyzes How this Contribution is Still Relevant Today
- Total: 2.00
- Distinguished – Thoroughly analyzes how this contribution is still relevant today.
- Proficient – Analyzes how this contribution is still relevant today. Minor details are missing.
- Basic – Minimally analyzes how this contribution is still relevant today. Relevant details are missing.
- Below Expectations – Attempts to analyze how this contribution is still relevant today; however, significant details are missing.
- Non-Performance – The analysis of how this contribution is still relevant today is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
- Examines How this Contribution Could Support or be Expanded for Future Community and Public Health Benefits
- Total: 2.00
- Distinguished – Thoroughly examines how this contribution could support or be expanded for future community and public health benefits.
- Proficient – Examines how this contribution could support or be expanded for future community and public health benefits. Minor details are missing.
- Basic – Minimally examines how this contribution could support or be expanded for future community and public health benefits. Relevant details are missing.
- Below Expectations – Attempts to examine how this contribution could support or be expanded for future community and public health benefits; however, significant details are missing.
- Non-Performance – The examination of how this contribution could support or be expanded for future community and public health benefits is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
- Critical Thinking: Evidence
- Total: 1.00
- Distinguished – Employs persuasive and applicable information from credible sources to develop an ample analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly.
- Proficient – Employs applicable information from credible sources to develop an analysis of the topic.
- Basic – Identifies applicable information from credible sources, but may neglect the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic.
- Below Expectations – Presents information from external sources, but such information may lack credibility and/or relevance. Neglects to apply such information toward the analysis of the topic.
- Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
- Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues
- Total: 1.00
- Distinguished – Clearly and comprehensively explains the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.
- Proficient – Clearly explains the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding.
- Basic – Briefly explains the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.
- Below Expectations – Briefly explains the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.
- Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
- Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
- Total: 0.50
- Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.
- Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.
- Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.
- Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.
- Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
- Written Communication: APA Formatting
- Total: 0.50
- Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
- Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
- Basic – Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.
- Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.
- Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
- Written Communication: Page Requirement
- Total: 0.25
- Distinguished – The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
- Proficient – The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
- Basic – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
- Below Expectations – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
- Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
- Written Communication: Resource Requirement
- Total: 0.25
- Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
- Proficient – Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
- Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.
- Below Expectations – Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.
- Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Week 3 – Assignment 2
Significant Contributions to Public Health Final Assignment Part 1
Prior to beginning work on this assignment, review these resources:
- Chapter 6 and Appendix II: Historical Figures in the textbook
- Intro to Epidemiology Study Types(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. video
- Introduction to Epidemiology and Public Health(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. video
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. website
- World Health Organization(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. website
Go to Week 5 and read the Significant Contributions to Public Health Final Assignment Part 2 details. Review the grading rubric in Week 3 and Week 5 to understand the full grading criteria. Because of the size of this project, you will be doing the first part of the Final Assignment this week, and then integrating your work and instructor’s feedback with the Final Assignment in Week 5.
For this assignment, you will be researching a historical figure in the public health world, their contribution to public health, and how their work helped shape the public health system that serves the community. Furthermore, you will be analyzing how their contribution from the past continues to contribute to today’s public health system, and how it might guide future work within the industry. You have the option of writing a paper or putting together a presentation.
Complete the following steps:
- Step 1: To begin, I was chosen to use Margaret Sanger
Use the outline below to organize your paper or presentation. Do not type the “Steps” into your paper or presentation. Rather, formulate a well thought out analysis with logical transitions as you would a professional paper or presentation. The grading rubric will be your guide for all the points you need to address in your final submission. Research and critical thinking is a large component of this project. You will curate resources to support your statements using proper APA Style.
- Step 2: Describe your Margaret Sangerbiographical background (i.e., experience).
- TIP: Research the individual’s background. This can include resume elements such as birthdate, location, education, and brief statement of their contribution to public health. (Reminder: biographical information can be easily plagiarized. Please do not copy from your biographical websites. Paraphrase or quote and cite everything according to APA.)
- Step 3: Analyze the climate of the time period in terms of political, socioeconomic, environmental, and technological context in which this person worked.
- TIP: Research the barriers and issue of the time. Think about whether this person was up against resistance or if the work this person did was welcomed. (For example, if you were writing on Abraham Lincoln and the abolition of slavery, you would note that slavery was prevalent and accepted at the time, and the change was welcomed by some and rejected by others.)
- Step 4: Examine the personal beliefs of your person that prompted this work.
- TIP: You are basically addressing the question: “Why did this person get involved with the issue at the time?” (In continuing the Lincoln example above, you would note that black people were considered property, not people; yet Lincoln believed everyone had equal rights regardless of skin color.)
- Step 5: Examine how this individual overcame or confronted any adversities.
- TIP: Think about how this person overcame the barriers and issues. Questions to consider: What did the person specifically do? Did they have any allies? How did their actions succeed or fail?
- Step 6: Describe the final outcome of this individual’s contribution to community or public health.
- TIP: Think about the importance of the contribution to community or public health at the time. Think about this question: What occurred as a result of this person’s action?
- Step 7: Explain what the individual’s contribution did for overall community or public health at the time.
- TIP: Think about this question: What was the purpose for the community or nation? (In the Lincoln example, the explanation would involve a national recognition of human rights of all people, regardless of skin color.)
- Step 8: Explain why this contribution was so important at that particular point in history.
- TIP: Think about this question: What made this important for our nation? (In the Lincoln example, you would answer the question: Why was it so important that Lincoln freed the slaves?)
Written Paper Format
The Significant Contributions to Public Health Final Assignment Part 1 paper
- Must be four double-spaced pages in length, not including title and references pages, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Writing Center’s APA Style.
- Must include a separate title page with the following:
- Title of paper
- Student’s name
- Course name and number
- Instructor’s name
- Date submitted
- Must utilize academic voice.
- Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.
- Must use at least four scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
- Must document any information used from sources in APA style as outlined in the
- Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Writing Center
Total Possible Score: 15.00
Describes the Selected Person’s Experience
Total: 1.50
Distinguished – Comprehensively describes the selected person’s experience.
Proficient – Describes the selected person’s experience. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Minimally describes the selected person’s experience. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to describe the selected person’s experience; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The description of the selected person’s experience is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Analyzes the Climate of the Time Period in Terms of the Political, Socioeconomic, Environmental, and Technological Contexts in Which this Person Worked
Total: 1.50
Distinguished – Comprehensively analyzes the climate of the time period in terms of the political, socioeconomic, environmental, and technological contexts in which this person worked.
Proficient – Accurately analyzes the climate of the time period in terms of the political, socioeconomic, environmental, and technological contexts in which this person worked. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Minimally analyzes the climate of the time period in terms of the political, socioeconomic, environmental, and technological contexts in which this person worked. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.
Below Expectations – Attempts to analyze the climate of the time period in terms of the political, socioeconomic, environmental, and technological contexts in which this person worked; however, significant details are missing and inaccurate.
Non-Performance – The analysis of the climate of the time period in terms of the political, socioeconomic, environmental, and technological contexts in which this person worked is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Examines the Personal Beliefs of the Person that Prompted His/Her Work
Total: 1.50
Distinguished – Comprehensively examines the personal beliefs of the person that prompted his/her work.
Proficient – Examines the personal beliefs of the person that prompted his/her work. Minor details are missing
Basic – Minimally examines the personal beliefs of the person that prompted his/her work. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to examine the personal beliefs of the person that prompted his/her work; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The examination of the personal beliefs of the person that prompted his/her work is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Examines How this Individual Overcame Any Adversities to Succeed in His/Her Task
Total: 1.50
Distinguished – Comprehensively examines how this individual overcame any adversities to succeed in his/her task.
Proficient – Examines how this individual overcame any adversities to succeed in his/her task. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Minimally examines how this individual overcame any adversities to succeed in his/her task. Relevant details are missing
Below Expectations – Attempts to examine how this individual overcame any adversities to succeed in his/her task; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The examination of how this individual overcame any adversities to succeed in his/her task is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describes the Final Outcome of this Individual’s Contribution to Community and/or Public Health
Total: 1.50
Distinguished – Thoroughly describes the final outcome of this individual’s contribution to community and/or public health.
Proficient – Describes the final outcome of this individual’s contribution to community and/or public health. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Minimally describes the final outcome of this individual’s contribution to community and/or public health. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to describe the final outcome of this individual’s contribution to community and/or public health; however, significant are missing.
Non-Performance – The description of the final outcome of this individual’s contribution to community and/or public health is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Explains What His/Her Contribution did for Overall Community and/or Public Health at the Time
Total: 1.50
Distinguished – Thoroughly explains what his/her contribution did for overall community and/or public health at the time.
Proficient – Explains what his/her contribution did for overall community and/or public health at the time. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Minimally explains what his/her contribution did for overall community and/or public health at the time. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to explain what his/her contribution did for overall community and/or public health at the time; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The explanation of what his/her contribution did for overall community and/or public health at the time is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions
Explains Why this Contribution Was So Important at that Particular Point in History
Total: 1.50
Distinguished – Thoroughly explains why this contribution was so important at that particular point in history.
Proficient – Explains why this contribution was so important at that particular point in history. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Minimally explains why this contribution was so important at that particular point in history. Relevant details are missing.
Below Expectations – Attempts to explain why this contribution was so important at that particular point in history; however, significant details are missing.
Non-Performance – The explanation of why this contribution was so important at that particular point in history is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions
Critical Thinking: Evidence
Total: 1.25
Distinguished – Employs persuasive and applicable information from credible sources to develop an ample analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly.
Proficient – Employs applicable information from credible sources to develop an analysis of the topic.
Basic – Identifies applicable information from credible sources, but may neglect the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic.
Below Expectations – Presents information from external sources, but such information may lack credibility and/or relevance. Neglects to apply such information toward the analysis of the topic.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues
Total: 1.25
Distinguished – Clearly and comprehensively explains the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.
Proficient – Clearly explains the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding.
Basic – Briefly explains the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.
Below Expectations – Briefly explains the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 0.50
Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.
Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: APA Formatting
Total: 0.50
Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic – Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.
Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Page Requirement
Total: 0.25
Distinguished – The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Proficient – The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Basic – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Below Expectations – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Non-Perfrmance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Resource Requirement
Total: 0.25
Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Proficient – Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.
Below Expectations – Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
