A suspect is apprehended in a large-chain grocery store by the security guard. The suspect is placed in handcuffs and taken to the manager’s office. The police are called and advised of the situation. Officer Jones arrives at the store approximately 12 minutes later. Officer Jones takes a statement from the security guard and views the in-store camera film of the shop lifting incident. Officer Jones places the suspect under arrest, reads the suspect the Miranda warnings, and asks the suspect if he would like to make a statement. The suspect replies, “No, I would like a lawyer”. The suspect is then transported to the local jail and booked. Five (5) hours later, the suspect is interviewed by a detective who again reads him the Miranda warning. The detective then asks the suspect if he would like to talk. The suspect says, “Yes”. He eventually confesses to the crime.
Write a one to two (1-2) page paper in which you:
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
|
Points: 100 |
Case Study 3: Confessions and Admissions after a Request for a Lawyer |
||||
|
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 60% F |
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
|
1. Identify and discuss the constitutional amendments that would relate to this situation. Weight: 35% |
Did not submit or incompletely identified and discussed the constitutional amendments that would relate to this situation. |
Insufficiently identified and discussed the constitutional amendments that would relate to this situation. |
Partially identified and discussed the constitutional amendments that would relate to this situation. |
Satisfactorily identified and discussed the constitutional amendments that would relate to this situation. |
Thoroughly identified and discussed the constitutional amendments that would relate to this situation. |
|
2. Discuss how the Edwards rule is related to this situation. |
Did not submit or incompletely discussed how the Edwards rule is related to this situation. |
Insufficiently discussed how the Edwards rule is related to this situation. |
Partially discussed how the Edwards rule is related to this situation. |
Satisfactorily discussed how the Edwards rule is related to this situation. |
Thoroughly discussed how the Edwards rule is related to this situation. |
|
3. In your opinion, determine if the suspect’s confession to the detective is admissible. Weight: 25% |
Did not submit or incompletely determined if the suspect’s confession to the detective is admissible. |
Insufficiently determined if the suspect’s confession to the detective is admissible. |
Partially determined if the suspect’s confession to the detective is admissible. |
Satisfactorily determined if the suspect’s confession to the detective is admissible. |
Thoroughly determined if the suspect’s confession to the detective is admissible. |
|
4. 2 references Weight: 5% |
No references provided |
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
|
5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% |
More than 8 errors present |
7-8 errors present |
5-6 errors present |
3-4 errors present |
0-2 errors present |