Creation of a Grant Proposal | Online Assignment Help
English 1302 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
The final project is the creation of a grant proposal.
The assessment for this course will be the construction of a grant proposal that targets a current need. The overall assessment will
demonstrate your ability not only to conduct research, but to think critically. Specifically, the paper will examine your ability to
address the following:
• Explanation of issues: Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding
• Evidence: Information is taken from source(s) with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Viewpoints of experts are questioned thoroughly.
• Influence of context and assumptions: Thoroughly analyzes own and others’ assumptions and carefully evaluates the relevance of contexts when presenting a position.
• Your position: Specific position is imaginative, taking into account the complexities of an issue. Limits of position are acknowledged. Others’ points of view are synthesized within position.
• Conclusions and related outcomes: Conclusions and related outcomes are logical and reflect your informed evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.
The project will be broken up into different sections throughout the semester and at the end you will combine each section into one
complete paper.
Some examples of grant proposal ideas have included:
• An elementary school has over 50 at-risk-students with behavior issues who are at risk with learning. This directly affects their ability for future success in school. A grant was submitted to support the development of a music program directly targeting
the lessons being taught to improve memory.
• The implementation of logotherapy with failing high school students to improve behavior and help change the attitude of these students.
This project is divided into four parts, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure
quality final submissions. These different parts are: Problem Identification, Literature Review, Justification, and the creation of a
PowerPoint Presentation to be submitted during finals week.
Prompt
The grant proposal will contain the critical elements listed below.
I. Problem Identification: Research and identify resources for a specific issue that needs to be corrected (3-4 pages). The
issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant
information necessary for full understanding.
a. Prevalence: Determine a necessary program or service by examining current needs.
i. What is the issue you have chosen to address? Who is affected? What data do you have that points to the prevalence of this issue?
b. Impact of the problem: Describe the impact of the problem on individuals, families, and the community. Construct an
impact statement on the prevalence of the identified issue and the lack of community resources.
i. Articulate how the lack of the identified program or service has an impact on the community. ii. How is the lack of available resources exacerbating the issue?
II. Literature Review: This section is an analysis of the scholarly debate on the theory and research related to your research question. The literature review should not be a collection of summaries. Rather, it should be organized according to the
message you want to convey and appropriately synthesize the literature into your message. This suggests that you will
draw from multiple sources in order to best communicate your points. Organize your review so that it provides a logical
argument for the background of your proposed research and how your research fits into the big picture (2-3 pages).
III. Justification: This section examines why your proposal will address the problem discussed. It should use various rhetorical techniques to convince and persuade the audience that what you are proposing will address the issue (4-5 pages).
In your submission, be sure to include the critical elements listed below:
▪ Research and justify the selection of a theoretically supported and effective intervention strategy for addressing the target issue.
• Efficacy: Critically examine intervention strategies for at least two theories used to address the problem/issue. How effective were these strategies in addressing the problem?
• Selection: Select a strategy and justify your selection based on its effectiveness. IV. Closing Statement: Conclude your grant proposal with careful attention to the audience you must convince.
Part II
Presentation
For this component, you will develop a presentation that articulates a convincing need for the proposal you have developed. The
presentation should be engaging and appealing to your target audience(s). You should envision yourself giving this presentation before
your target audience(s).
This is your opportunity to demonstrate your understanding of the problem you have identified and the need to address and alleviate
the problem. Remember you are seeking support of the proposal, so knowing your audience and tailoring your message to them is
crucial.
Since you will not actually deliver this presentation, you must create a self-sustaining presentation. The presentation should adhere to
the principles of an effective presentation, and all your sources should be cited properly. There is no minimum or maximum number of
slides required. You should use your judgement to create a presentation of appropriate length that will convey all of the necessary
information while keeping the attention of your audience.
Final Project Rubric
Guidelines for submission: Your grant proposal must be 9-15 pages in length (plus your works cited page) and must be written in
MLA format. Include at least 6 sources cited in MLA format.
Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not evident
Problem Identification:
Prevalence
Submission provides
comprehensive research
evidence of the
existence and
prevalence of the
identified problem/need
and provides examples
to support argument.
Submission provides
published data that
evidences the identified
problem is a prevalent
problem/need
Submission provides
limited data to support
that the identified
problem is a prevalent
problem/need
Submission lacks
credible research data to
support that the
identified problem is a
prevalent issue
Problem Identification:
Impact of the Problem
Submission research
supported evidence in a
highly detailed and
professional manner that
demonstrates the
comprehensive impact
that the identified
problem has been
proven to have on
individuals, families,
and the community and
grounds claims in actual
examples and relevant
theory
Submission provides
research supported
evidence of how the
identified problem will
have an impact on
individuals, families,
and the community if
the problem is not
addressed proactively
Submission provides
research evidence of the
general impact of the
problem without
considering the specific
community
Submission discusses
the general impact of
the problem without
considering the specific
community or without
providing research
evidence to support the
impact of the identified
problem
Thesis The thesis statement is
in the form of a
declarative sentence that
clearly and concisely
The thesis statement is
in the form of a
declarative sentence and
states an argument,
The thesis statement is
in the form of a
declarative sentence but
states a weak or
incomplete argument.
There is no thesis
states the author’s main
point
which may be too
broad.
Literature Review Submission provides aa
comprehensive
examination of the
identified problem
through the use of
credible sources and
draws unique insights
from the literature
Submission contains
substantial evidence that
the identified
problem/need has been
explored through the
use of current
professional research
publications
Submission contains
limited evidence that the
identified problem/need
has been explored
through the use of
professional sources
Submission does not
contain evidence that
the identified
problem/need has been
explored through the
use of professional
research; research may
be from non-credible
sources, or absent from
the submission
Justification: Efficacy Submission evidences a
comprehensive review
of the strategies used for
the identified problem
(considers at least two)
and uses examples to
illustrate claims
Submission
demonstrates
consideration of
evidence based
strategies for the
identified problem
(considers a minimum
of two strategies)
Submission
demonstrates
consideration of
evidence based
intervention strategies
for the identified
problem; submission
may consider only a
single intervention
strategy
Submission
demonstrates minimal
consideration of
evidence based
intervention strategies
for the problem/need,
and the submission
considers only a single
strategy
Justification: Selection Submission evidences a
clear selection to
address the
need/problem that has
strong support from the
research. In addition,
the conclusions and
related outcomes are
logical and reflect an
informed evaluation and
ability to place evidence
Submission evidences a
clear selection of an
intervention strategy.
The conclusion is
logically tied to a range
of information,
including opposing
viewpoints, related
outcomes are identified
clearly.
Submission has a clear
strategy to address the
need but it may lack a
clear basis. The
conclusion is logically
tied to information;
some related outcomes
are identified clearly.
Submission evidences a
selection that lacks a
clear basis in research
support, and conclusion
is inconsistently tied to
some of the information
discussed; related
outcomes are
oversimplified.
and perspectives
discussed in priority
order.
Closing Statement Submission evidences a
closing statement which
comprises the main
points of the grant in a
logical fashion.
Submission evidences a
closing statement which
comprises the main
points of the grant
Submission evidences a
closing statement, but
fails to comprise all of
the main points of the
grant
Submission does not
evidence a closing
statement
Articulation of
Response
Submission is free of
errors related to MLA,
citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
organization and is
presented in a
professional and easy to
read format
Submission has no
major errors related to
MLA, citations,
grammar, spelling,
syntax, or organization
Submission has major
errors related to MLA,
citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or
organization that
negatively impact
readability and
articulation of main
ideas
Submission has critical
errors related to MLA,
citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or
organization that
prevent understanding
of ideas
Presentation
Critical Element Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not evidence
Presentation Submission clearly
articulates a convincing
need for the proposal.
The presentation is
engaging and appealing
to target audience. It
clearly demonstrates
your understanding of
the problem and the
need to address and
alleviate it.
Submission articulates a
convincing need for the
proposal. The
presentation uses
attempts to use
techniques to engage
and appeal to the target
audience. It
demonstrates an
understanding of the
Submission states the
need for the proposal.
There is a lack of
engagement and appeal
to the target audience. It
lacks in showing an
understanding of the
problem and the need to
alleviate it.
Submission was put
together at last minute.
There is no attempt to
engage the audience.
problem and the need to
alleviate it.
Articulation of
Response
Submission is free of
errors related to MLA,
citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
organization and is
presented in a
professional and easy to
read format
Submission has no
major errors related to
MLA, citations,
grammar, spelling,
syntax, or organization
Submission has major
errors related to MLA,
citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or
organization that
negatively impact
readability and
articulation of main
ideas
Submission has critical
errors related to MLA,
citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or
organization that
prevent understanding
of ideas
