Conflicting Viewpoints Essay | Online Assignment Help

Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part II (Pro Concealed Weapons)

Synthesizing and Writing
Due Week 4 and worth 100 points

When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking.

In Part II of the assignment (due Week 4), you will write a paper to synthesize your ideas.

Part II – Writing
Write at three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:
1. State your position on the topic you selected for Assignment 1.1. (Part I attached)

2. Identify (3) three premises (reasons) from the Procon.org website that support your position    and explain why you selected these specific reasons.

3. Explain your answers to the “believing” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website.

4. Examine at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.

5. Discuss the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.

6. Discuss whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue has stayed the same.

7. Use at least three different sources and site them properly in your paper.

The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing:

• Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph.
• Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.
• Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

• This course requires use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

• Identify the informal fallacies, assumptions, and biases involved in manipulative appeals and abuses of language.
• Create written work utilizing the concepts of critical thinking.
• Use technology and information resources to research issues in critical thinking skills and informal logic.

Intro Pro Concealed Weapons

In modern America, the use of concealed guns has raised different debates against the safety of its population and if the ownership of firearms is ideal. Responsible citizens are a familiar source of support for the use of weapons (Lott, 2013). Some responsible citizens and individuals help and support the protection of the other innocent people. According to the 2nd amendment, US citizens have the right to bear arms. It is essential to consider the rights of US citizens and support the constitution (Spitzer, 2015). Within these right citizens can possess a concealed firearm. The use of concealed weapons can be effectively be used to stop any crime before the arrival of the police. It is also a common way to stand up for injustice and focus on the wellbeing of others (Kleck, 2016). The sensible use of guns can help the police to deter criminal activities. I believe that accountable and law-abiding citizens can assist in preventing crimes if they have concealed weapons.

Opposing Views

The use of concealed weapons in the modern community is a pathway for increased crimes. Not all individuals in society are responsible (ProCon, 2018). It is a risk if all individuals have hidden weapons since this is an incident factor for criminal activities.

According to the 2nd amendment’s right, the right to bear arms has limitations. Citizens may concealed weapons but only for self-protection, and this is to influence, develop, and reduce the use of guns in public (Spitzer, 2015). There is also the need to focus on the safety measures and to protect the value of the society.

The possession of guns is also a way for a criminal to brand weapons in public. Criminals will also take the opportunity to hold and use their firearms when they feel the need. Criminal acts will hinder how the community and society interact effectively.

Believing Questions

The opposing views of the limits to concealed guns, criminal opportunities, and rise in crimes are impressive as they highlight how the use of concealed weapons in the community impacts the safety of those using and not using guns.

What I find interesting, for instance, is the argument that it is not safe to use concealed weapons since this will make me a criminal. That statement would be valid under the condition of using a concealed weapon without the support of the community and police (Spitzer, 2015). The limitations on the 2nd amendment also help to protect against the increase of crimes in a population.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the use of concealed firearms goes against the values of many, and the arguments of those who opposed guns state how they are not essential and ideal to influence a positive protective culture. It is also crucial to focus on the reasons as to why one should have a concealed weapon. Though many reasons go against concealed firearms, there are just as many arguments that support a positive influence in the protective culture. Law abiding and responsible citizens will help those in need when there is a relevant situation.

References

Kleck, G., Kovandzic, T., & Bellows, J. (2016). Does gun control reduce violent crime?. Criminal justice review, 41(4), 488-513.

Lott, J. R. (2013). More guns, less crime: Understanding crime and gun control laws. University of Chicago Press.

Spitzer, R. J. (2015). Politics of gun control. Routledge.

Concealed Guns ProCon.org. (n.d.). Retrieved October 12, 2018, from

https://concealedguns.procon.org/